Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737633›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Fabrication of biochar derived from different types of feedstocks as an efficient adsorbent for soil heavy metal removal.

Marina Burachevskaya, Tatiana Minkina, Tatiana Bauer, Ilya Lobzenko, Alexey Fedorenko, Mahmoud Mazarji, Svetlana Sushkova, Saglara Mandzhieva, Alexander Nazarenko, Vera Butova and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Marina BurachevskayaSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Tatiana MinkinaSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Tatiana BauerSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Ilya LobzenkoSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Alexey FedorenkoSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Mahmoud MazarjiSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Svetlana SushkovaSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Saglara MandzhievaSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Alexander NazarenkoThe Southern Scientific Centre, Russian Academy of Sciences, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Vera ButovaSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia.
Ming Hung WongConsortium On Health, Environment, Education, and Research (CHEER), and Department of Science and Environmental Studies, The Education University of Hong Kong, Tai Po, Hong Kong, China.
Vishnu D RajputSouthern Federal University, Rostov-on-Don, Russia. rvishnu@sfedu.ru.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For effective soil remediation, it is vital to apply environmentally friendly and cost-effective technologies following the notion of green sustainable development. In the context of recycling waste and preserving nutrients in the soil, biochar production and utilization have become widespread. There is an urgent need to develop high-efficiency biochar-based sorbents for pollution removal from soil. This research examined the efficacy of soil remediation using biochar made from three distinct sources: wood, and agricultural residues (sunflower and rice husks). The generated biochars were characterized by SEM/SCEM, XRF, XRD, FTIR, BET Specific Surface Area, and elemental compositions. The presence of hydroxyl and phenolic functional groups and esters in wood, sunflower and rice husk biochar were noted. The total volume of pores was in the following descending order: rice husk > wood > sunflower husk. However, wood biochar had more thermally stable, heterogeneous, irregular-shaped pores than other samples. Adsorption of soil-heavy metals into biochars differed depending on the type of adsorbent, according to data derived from distribution coefficients, sorption degree, Freundlich, and Langmuir adsorption models. The input of biochars to Calcaric Fluvic Arenosol increased its adsorption ability under contamination by Cu(II), Zn(II), and Pb(II) in the following order: wood > rice husk > sunflower husk. The addition of sunflower husk, wood, and rice husk biochar to the soil led to an increase in the removal efficiency of metals in all cases (more than 77%). The increase in the percentage adsorption of Cu and Pb was 9-19%, of Zn was 11-21%. The present results indicated that all biochars functioned well as an absorbent for removing heavy metals from soils. The tailor-made surface chemistry properties and the high sorption efficiency of the biochar from sunflower and rice husks could potentially be used for soil remediation.

Indexed as

HelianthusMetals, HeavyOryzaSoil PollutantsAdsorptionCharcoalLeadSoilbiocharCharcoalLeadMetals, HeavySoilSoil Pollutants

Identifiers

PMID36737633
PMCPMC9898244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.