Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737594›Full record

ArticleAdvances in therapy2023

Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns, and Effectiveness in Chinese Patients with Angina Pectoris Using Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes: Protocol for a Multicenter, Prospective, Cohort Study (GREAT).

Xiliang Zhao, Zichuan Tong, Liling Sun, Qihua Zhang, Xin Du, Su'e Xu, Chengning Shen, Ying Wei, Wei Liu, Lifu Miao and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Advances in therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05050773 (A Real-world Study of Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness in Chinese Patients With Angina Pectoris), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05050773 completednot on this map

A Real-world Study of Clinical Characteristics, Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness in Chinese Patients With Angina Pectoris

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorBeijing Anzhen HospitalRan2021 to 2023Enrolled1,556ConditionsAngina Pectoris, Real World Study
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Xiliang ZhaoCenter for Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.
Zichuan TongDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Daxing District People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Liling SunDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Changping District Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qihua ZhangDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Miyun District Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xin DuCenter for Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China.
Su'e XuDepartment of Cardiology, Huai'an Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Chengning ShenDepartment of Cardiology, Ruyang People's Hospital, Ruyang, China.
Ying WeiDepartment of Cardiology, Dezhou People's Hospital, Dezhou, China.
Wei LiuDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.
Lifu MiaoDepartment of Cardiology, Beijing Huaxin Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yong ZengCenter for Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, 100029, China. yzeng_anzhen@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3470-508X
Beijing Anzhen Hospital · CNBeijing Hospital · CNBeijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNBeijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital · CNDezhou University · CNFuyang City People's Hospital · CNPeking University · CNShaoxing People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAngina pectoris (AP) is the initial and the most common manifestation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Therefore, management and control of AP can help prevent further complications associated with CAD. However, there is under-reporting of angina symptoms in clinical practice, resulting in under-treatment and reduced quality of life (QoL). Prospective and standardized monitoring is needed to support timely and appropriate treatment.

objectivesTo establish a large cohort of Chinese patients with AP and compare the effectiveness of different anti-angina regimens with the help of electronic patient-reported outcomes (e-PROs), using the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) to assess health status.

methodsThe registry study (GREAT) is a multicenter, prospective, observational, cohort study. Patients diagnosed with AP will be enrolled from 10 hospitals and assessed based on the different anti-anginal regimens. Patients will be followed up every 3 months from baseline to 12 months to observe the difference in the therapeutic effectiveness of the drugs. Data will be collected in the form of e-PROs combined with on-site visit records. PLANNED OUTCOMES: The change in SAQ summary score (SAQ SS) at Month 12 from baseline will be the primary outcome. The secondary measures will include changes in SAQ SS at Months 3, 6, and 9 from baseline, changes in retest results of vascular stenosis imaging at Month 12 from baseline, and medication adherence based on the proportion of days covered. Safety data will be evaluated based on the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

conclusionThis study will evaluate the effectiveness of anti-anginal regimens using ePROs in real-world settings in China. The results from this study may provide a new perspective on treatment patterns and the effectiveness of different anti-anginal regimens for patients with AP. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05050773.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular AgentsCoronary Artery DiseaseAngina PectorisCohort StudiesEast Asian PeopleHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeCardiovascular AgentsAngina pectorisAnti-anginal regimense-PROStudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID36737594
OpenAlexW4319216438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.