Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737592›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2023

Drain Placement After Pancreatic Resection: Friend or Foe For Surgical Site Infections?

Tommaso Pollini, Paul Wong, Lyonell B Kone, Rym El Khoury, Chris Kabir, Vijay K Maker, Mihaela Banulescu, Ajay V Maker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prophylactic abdominal drainage for pancreatic surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tommaso PolliniDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Paul WongDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Lyonell B KoneDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Creticos Cancer Center at Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rym El KhouryDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA.
Chris KabirDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Creticos Cancer Center at Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Vijay K MakerDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Creticos Cancer Center at Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Mihaela BanulescuDepartment of Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Creticos Cancer Center at Advocate Illinois Masonic Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
Ajay V MakerDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA. ajay.maker@ucsf.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8234-2762
University of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite multiple studies and randomized trials, there remains controversy over whether drains should be placed, and if so for how long, after pancreas resection. The aim was to determine if post-pancreatectomy drain placement and timing of drain removal were associated with differences in infectious outcomes and, if so, which specific procedures and infectious sites were most at risk.

methodsThe ACS-NSQIP targeted pancreatectomy database was utilized to identify patients who underwent pancreatectomies between 2015 and 2020 with postoperative drain placement for retrospective cohort analysis. A propensity score matching analyses was conducted to determine associations between drain placement and surgical site infections (SSI).

resultsOf 39,057 pancreatic resections, 66.4% were proximal pancreatectomies, and 33.6% were distal pancreatectomies. After propensity score matching, drain placement was not associated with significantly lower rates of superficial SSI (7% vs 9%, p = 0.755) or organ/space SSI (17% vs 16%, p = 0.647) after proximal pancreatectomy. After distal pancreatectomy, drain placement was associated with higher rates of organ/space SSI (12% vs 9%, p = 0.010). Drain removal on or after postoperative day 3 was significantly associated with higher rates of SSI in both proximal and distal pancreatectomy.

conclusionsDrain placement is associated with an increased rate of organ/space SSI after distal pancreatectomy and not after pancreaticoduodenectomy. When drains are utilized, early removal is associated with a reduction of SSI after all types of pancreatectomy. In surgical units where post-pancreatectomy SSI is a concern, selective drain placement for high-risk glands or after distal pancreatectomy, combined with early drain removal, may be considered.

Indexed as

PancreatectomySurgical Wound InfectionDrainageHumansPancreatic FistulaPancreaticoduodenectomyPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesDrainsPancreasSurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID36737592
OpenAlexW4319072815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.