Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737561›Full record

ArticleInfection2023

MxA for differentiating viral and bacterial infections in adults: a prospective, exploratory study.

Matthäus Metz, Guido A Gualdoni, Heide-Maria Winkler, Alexandra-Maria Warenits, Johannes Stöckl, Heinz Burgmann, Stefan Winkler, Zoe Anne Oesterreicher

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthäus MetzDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Guido A GualdoniDivision of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Heide-Maria WinklerDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra-Maria WarenitsDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Johannes StöcklInstitute of Immunology, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology, and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Heinz BurgmannDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan WinklerDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Zoe Anne OesterreicherDivision of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria. zoeanne.oesterreicher@stpoelten.lknoe.at.
Medical University of Vienna · ATSt. Pölten University of Applied Sciences · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInappropriate antibiotic prescription in patients with viral infections contributes to the surge of antibiotic resistance. Viral infections induce the expression of the antiviral protein MxA in monocytes, which is a promising biomarker to differentiate between viral and bacterial diseases. In this prospective, exploratory study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic value of monocyte MxA expression in adults with viral, bacterial or co-infections.

methodsWe measured monocyte MxA expression using flow cytometry in a cohort of 61 adults with various viral, bacterial and co-infections including patients receiving immunosuppressive therapy.

resultsMonocyte MxA expression in virus-infected patients was significantly higher compared to bacterial infections (83.3 [66.8, 109.4] vs. 33.8 [29.3, 47.8] mean fluorescence intensity [MFI]; p < 0.0001) but not co-infections (53.1 [33.9, 88.9] MFI). At a threshold of 62.2 MFI, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to differentiate between viral and bacterial infections was 0.9, with a sensitivity and specificity of 92.3% and 84.6%, respectively. Immunosuppressive therapy did not affect monocyte MxA expression in virus-infected patients.

conclusionOur findings corroborate the diagnostic performance of MxA in differentiating viral and bacterial infections but also point to an important caveat of MxA in viral-bacterial co-infections. This study extends previous reports and indicates that MxA is also a useful biomarker in immunocompromised patients.

Indexed as

Bacterial InfectionsCoinfectionVirus DiseasesVirusesAdultBiomarkersHumansMyxovirus Resistance ProteinsProspective StudiesBiomarkersMyxovirus Resistance ProteinsAntibiotic resistanceBiomarkerMx1MxAMyxovirus resistance protein 1Viral infection

Identifiers

PMID36737561
PMCPMC9897883
OpenAlexW4319072615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.