Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737433›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2023

Association of time spent in outdoor light and genetic risk with the incidence of depression.

Jing Lin, Hongxi Yang, Yuan Zhang, Zhi Cao, Dun Li, Li Sun, Xinyu Zhang, Yaogang Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jing Lin *School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Hongxi Yang *Department of Bioinformatics, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yuan Zhang *Raymond G. Perelman Center for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Zhi CaoSchool of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China.
Dun LiSchool of Integrative Medicine, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Tianjin, China.
Li SunSchool of Nursing, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Xinyu ZhangSchool of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Yaogang WangSchool of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China. YaogangWANG@tmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-2493-6471
Tianjin Medical University · CNTianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · USZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Depression is the consequence of both environment and genes working together. Genetic factors increase depression risk, but it is unclear whether this association can be offset by time spent in outdoor light. The study was undertaken to investigate the optimal time spent in outdoor light for lowering the risk of depression and the joint association of time spent in outdoor light and depression genetic risk. In UK Biobank, 380,976 depression-free individuals were included in this study. Polygenic risk score (PRS) was categorized into three groups in terms of tertiles. Time spent in outdoor light on a typical day in summer or winter originated from the questionnaire survey. Depression was defined as hospital admission. The potential dose-response relationship between time spent in outdoor light and depression risk was shown by a restricted cubic spline. Data were analyzed using Cox regressions and Laplace regression. After the median follow-up of 12.6 years, 13,636 individuals suffered from depression in the end. A nonlinear (J-shaped relationship) trend was observed between time spent in outdoor light and depression risk. On average, 1.5 h/day of outdoor light was related to the minimum risk of depression. Individuals below and above this optimal time both had elevated depression risk (below, HR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.02-1.16; above, HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.07-1.20), and the time to incident depression were both shortened by 0.46 years (50th percentile differences [PD] = -0.46, 95% CI: -0.78, -0.14) and 0.63 years (50th PD = -0.63, 95% CI: -0.90, -0.35) years, respectively. In a comparison of individuals with the lowest tertile of PRS and average 1.5 h/day outdoor light, the HRs and 95% CIs of depression were 1.36 (1.21-1.53) and 1.43 (1.29-1.58) in those with the highest tertile of PRS and below/above this reference value, respectively. Significant multiplicative interactions were observed between intermediate genetic risks and longer time spent in outdoor light. We found that an average of 1.5 h/day spent in outdoor light was associated with a lower depression risk whatever the degree of depression genetic predisposition. Moderate time spent in outdoor light may contribute to a decreased depression risk even among people with a higher genetic risk of depression.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMultifactorial InheritanceHumansIncidenceRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID36737433
PMCPMC9898270
OpenAlexW4319073991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.