Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737104›Full record

ReviewRNA (New York, N.Y.)2023

Review of single-cell RNA-seq data clustering for cell-type identification and characterization.

Shixiong Zhang, Xiangtao Li, Jiecong Lin, Qiuzhen Lin, Ka-Chun Wong

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shixiong ZhangSchool of Computer Science and Technology, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, China sxzhang7-c@my.cityu.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-0314-9199
Xiangtao LiSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Jilin University, Jilin 130012, China.
Jiecong LinDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Qiuzhen LinCollege of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Ka-Chun WongDepartment of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the advances in single-cell RNA-seq techniques have enabled us to perform large-scale transcriptomic profiling at single-cell resolution in a high-throughput manner. Unsupervised learning such as data clustering has become the central component to identify and characterize novel cell types and gene expression patterns. In this study, we review the existing single-cell RNA-seq data clustering methods with critical insights into the related advantages and limitations. In addition, we also review the upstream single-cell RNA-seq data processing techniques such as quality control, normalization, and dimension reduction. We conduct performance comparison experiments to evaluate several popular single-cell RNA-seq clustering approaches on simulated and multiple single-cell transcriptomic data sets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSingle-Cell Gene Expression AnalysisCluster AnalysisGene Expression ProfilingSequence Analysis, RNASingle-Cell Analysiscell typesclusteringsingle-cell RNA-seq

Identifiers

PMID36737104
PMCPMC10158997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.