Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36737094›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Sodium channel-inhibiting drugs and cancer-specific survival: a population-based study of electronic primary care data.

Caroline Fairhurst, Fabiola Martin, Ian Watt, Martin Bland, Tim Doran, William John Brackenbury

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. A novel NaOncogene · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Caroline FairhurstHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Fabiola MartinUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Ian WattHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Martin BlandHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Tim DoranHealth Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
William John BrackenburyDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, UK william.brackenbury@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-6882-3351
University of York · GBThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25922Cancer Research UK 30380Medical Research Council G1000508Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAntiepileptic and antiarrhythmic drugs inhibit voltage-gated sodium (Na

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingIndividual electronic primary healthcare records extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

participantsRecords for 132 996 patients with a diagnosis of breast, bowel or prostate cancer. OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyse cancer-specific survival associated with exposure to VGSC inhibitors. Exposure to non-VGSC-inhibiting antiepileptic medication and other non-VGSC blockers were also considered. Drug exposure was treated as a time-varying covariate to account for immortal time bias.

resultsDuring 1 002 225 person-years of follow-up, there were 42 037 cancer-specific deaths. 53 724 (40.4%) patients with cancer had at least one prescription for a VGSC inhibitor of interest. Increased risk of cancer-specific mortality was associated with exposure to this group of drugs (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.56 to 1.63, p<0.001). This applied to VGSC-inhibiting tricyclic antidepressants (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.50 to 1.65, p<0.001), local anaesthetics (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.55, p<0.001) and anticonvulsants (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.48, p<0.001) and persisted in sensitivity analyses. In contrast, exposure to VGSC-inhibiting class 1c and 1d antiarrhythmics was associated with significantly improved cancer-specific survival (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88, p<0.001 and HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.88, p=0.01, respectively).

conclusionsAssociation between VGSC inhibitor use and mortality in patients with cancer varies according to indication. Exposure to VGSC-inhibiting antiarrhythmics, but not anticonvulsants, supports findings from preclinical data, with improved survival. However, additional confounding factors may underlie these associations, highlighting the need for further study.

Indexed as

Anti-Arrhythmia AgentsAnticonvulsantsNeoplasmsSodium Channel BlockersElectronicsHumansPrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAnticonvulsantsSodium Channel BlockersBreast tumoursCLINICAL PHARMACOLOGYEpilepsyONCOLOGY

Identifiers

PMID36737094
PMCPMC9900071
OpenAlexW4319078552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.