ArticleBMJ open2023
Sodium channel-inhibiting drugs and cancer-specific survival: a population-based study of electronic primary care data.
Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting ion channel dysregulation in tumors: emerging therapeutic opportunities.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2026Review
- Investigating the Effects of Sea Anemone (Stichodactyla haddoni) Toxin on Potassium and Sodium Channel Gene Expression and Cell Death Mechanisms in A549 Cells.Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Dielectrophoresis and ζ-potential as potential low-cost complements to patch clamp for measurement of cell electrophysiology.PloS one · 2026Article
- Pharmacological targeting and characterization of Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels (VGSCs) expressed in the high-grade glioma microenvironment.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Vitamins and minerals and their role in cancer: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Review
- Electrical excitability of cancer cells-CELEX model updated.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2024Review
- Novel insights into voltage-gated ion channels: Translational breakthroughs in medical oncology.Channels (Austin, Tex.) · 2024Article
- A novel NaOncogene · 2024Article
- Voltage-gated sodium channels in cancers.Biomarker research · 2024Review
- Repositioning of antiarrhythmics for prostate cancer treatment: a novel strategy to reprogram cancer-associated fibroblasts towards a tumor-suppressive phenotype.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2024Article
- Ranolazine: a potential anti-metastatic drug targeting voltage-gated sodium channels.British journal of cancer · 2024Review
- Therapeutic targeting of voltage-gated sodium channel NaFrontiers in pharmacology · 2024Review
- Blocking channels to metastasis: targeting sodium transport in breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesAntiepileptic and antiarrhythmic drugs inhibit voltage-gated sodium (Na
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingIndividual electronic primary healthcare records extracted from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.
participantsRecords for 132 996 patients with a diagnosis of breast, bowel or prostate cancer. OUTCOME MEASURES: Adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyse cancer-specific survival associated with exposure to VGSC inhibitors. Exposure to non-VGSC-inhibiting antiepileptic medication and other non-VGSC blockers were also considered. Drug exposure was treated as a time-varying covariate to account for immortal time bias.
resultsDuring 1 002 225 person-years of follow-up, there were 42 037 cancer-specific deaths. 53 724 (40.4%) patients with cancer had at least one prescription for a VGSC inhibitor of interest. Increased risk of cancer-specific mortality was associated with exposure to this group of drugs (HR 1.59, 95% CI 1.56 to 1.63, p<0.001). This applied to VGSC-inhibiting tricyclic antidepressants (HR 1.61, 95% CI 1.50 to 1.65, p<0.001), local anaesthetics (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.43 to 1.55, p<0.001) and anticonvulsants (HR 1.40, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.48, p<0.001) and persisted in sensitivity analyses. In contrast, exposure to VGSC-inhibiting class 1c and 1d antiarrhythmics was associated with significantly improved cancer-specific survival (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.64 to 0.88, p<0.001 and HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.88, p=0.01, respectively).
conclusionsAssociation between VGSC inhibitor use and mortality in patients with cancer varies according to indication. Exposure to VGSC-inhibiting antiarrhythmics, but not anticonvulsants, supports findings from preclinical data, with improved survival. However, additional confounding factors may underlie these associations, highlighting the need for further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.