ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice2023
Trends and Variation in Pediatric Anaphylaxis Care From 2016 to 2022.
Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Updates in the Management of Anaphylaxis: The Role of the Pediatrician.Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice · 2026Article
- RECOVER Guidelines: First Aid. Evidence, Treatment Recommendations, Knowledge Gap Analysis, and Clinical Guidelines for Acute Allergy and Anaphylaxis in Dogs and Cats.Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care (San Antonio, Tex. : 2001) · 2026Article
- Epinephrine Underuse for Anaphylaxis in Infants and Toddlers: A Practical Review for Pediatricians.Paediatric drugs · 2026Review
- Incidence and clinical management of paediatric emergency presentations of anaphylaxis in Alberta.Paediatrics & child health · 2026Article
- Anaphylaxis: Clinical Criteria, Severity, and Clinical Courses.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2026Review
- Rising trends in infant ER encounters for food-induced allergic reactions in the era of early allergenic food introduction.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026Article
- Italian Evidence-Based Clinical Recommendations on the Appropriateness of Prescriptions and Diagnostic Tests in Pediatric Allergology: Focus on Anaphylaxis, Drug Allergy and Hymenoptera Venom Allergy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Anaphylaxis definition, overview, and clinical support tool: 2024 consensus report-a GAThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2025Article
- Emergency Monitoring Following A Diagnosis of Anaphylaxis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025Review
- Pediatric Anaphylaxis in Emergency Care: A Detailed Analysis of Demographic and Laboratory Findings.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2025Article
- Trends and Hospital Outcomes in HOSPITAL Admissions for Anaphylaxis in Children with and without Asthma in Spain (2016-2021).Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Anaphylaxis management in a French pediatric emergency department: Lessons from the ANA-PED study.Clinical and translational allergy · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVariation in the use of treatments and hospitalization for anaphylaxis would suggest a lack of consensus in therapeutic approach.
objectiveTo evaluate trends and practice variation in the emergency department (ED) care of children with anaphylaxis in a large US cohort.
methodsWe conducted a 48-site retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System from January 2016 through September 2022. Children younger than 18 years with a primary diagnosis of anaphylaxis were included. Care trends were assessed using negative binomial regression modeling. Rates of medication use, hospitalizations, and revisits were reported as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs).
resultsThere were 42,909 ED visits for anaphylaxis, with a 4.2% per-year increase in visit incidence (95% CI, 1.8-6.7) during the study period. The median hospitalization rate was 3.5% (IQR, 2.2-6.0), and the 3-day ED revisit rate was 0.6% (IQR, 0.4-0.9). The hospital-level median use of therapies included intramuscular epinephrine (55.3%; IQR, 50.1-59.9), systemic steroids (73.8%; IQR, 63.9-81.4), antihistamines (59.9%; IQR, 53.5-65.5), H2-receptor antagonists (56.8%; IQR, 42.3-66.2), bronchodilators (15.1%; IQR, 12.5-17.0), inhaled epinephrine (1.1%; IQR, 0.6-1.9), and fluid boluses (19.8%; IQR, 11.3-29.3). Severe reactions requiring intensive care unit admission (1.5%; IQR, 0.8-2.2), vasopressors (0.3%; IQR, 0.0-0.6), and intubation (0.2%; IQR, 0.0-0.3) were rare.
conclusionsED visits for anaphylaxis increased during the study period, but hospitalization rates were low. Substantial variation exists between EDs regarding the use of anaphylaxis therapies, supporting the need for future research to evaluate the efficacy of these medications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.