Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36736955›Full record

ArticleThe journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice2023

Trends and Variation in Pediatric Anaphylaxis Care From 2016 to 2022.

Timothy E Dribin, Mark I Neuman, David Schnadower, Hugh A Sampson, John J Porter, Kenneth A Michelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Anaphylaxis: Clinical Criteria, Severity, and Clinical Courses.Immunology and allergy clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Emergency Monitoring Following A Diagnosis of Anaphylaxis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Timothy E DribinDivision of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: Timothy.Dribin@cchmc.org.
Mark I NeumanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
David SchnadowerDivision of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio; Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Hugh A SampsonDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
John J PorterDivision of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
Kenneth A MichelsonDivision of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Mass; Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.

Funding

LCenter for Clinical and Translational Science and TrainingUL1TR001425 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI HEUBI, JAMES E., KISSELA, BRETT M · 2015 to 2024
$37.5M
KL2 Training ProgramKL2TR001426 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI ZELLER, MARGARET H · 2015 to 2024
$6.8M
Delayed Diagnosis of Serious Pediatric Emergency ConditionsK08HS026503 · AHRQ · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI MICHELSON, KENNETH · 2019 to 2023
$763k
AHRQ HHS K08 HS026503NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR001426NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001425
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVariation in the use of treatments and hospitalization for anaphylaxis would suggest a lack of consensus in therapeutic approach.

objectiveTo evaluate trends and practice variation in the emergency department (ED) care of children with anaphylaxis in a large US cohort.

methodsWe conducted a 48-site retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System from January 2016 through September 2022. Children younger than 18 years with a primary diagnosis of anaphylaxis were included. Care trends were assessed using negative binomial regression modeling. Rates of medication use, hospitalizations, and revisits were reported as medians with interquartile ranges (IQRs).

resultsThere were 42,909 ED visits for anaphylaxis, with a 4.2% per-year increase in visit incidence (95% CI, 1.8-6.7) during the study period. The median hospitalization rate was 3.5% (IQR, 2.2-6.0), and the 3-day ED revisit rate was 0.6% (IQR, 0.4-0.9). The hospital-level median use of therapies included intramuscular epinephrine (55.3%; IQR, 50.1-59.9), systemic steroids (73.8%; IQR, 63.9-81.4), antihistamines (59.9%; IQR, 53.5-65.5), H2-receptor antagonists (56.8%; IQR, 42.3-66.2), bronchodilators (15.1%; IQR, 12.5-17.0), inhaled epinephrine (1.1%; IQR, 0.6-1.9), and fluid boluses (19.8%; IQR, 11.3-29.3). Severe reactions requiring intensive care unit admission (1.5%; IQR, 0.8-2.2), vasopressors (0.3%; IQR, 0.0-0.6), and intubation (0.2%; IQR, 0.0-0.3) were rare.

conclusionsED visits for anaphylaxis increased during the study period, but hospitalization rates were low. Substantial variation exists between EDs regarding the use of anaphylaxis therapies, supporting the need for future research to evaluate the efficacy of these medications.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisBronchodilator AgentsChildEmergency Service, HospitalEpinephrineHospitalizationHumansRetrospective StudiesBronchodilator AgentsEpinephrineAnaphylaxisAntihistaminesBronchodilatorsCorticosteroidsEmergency departmentEpinephrineHospitalizationsTrendsVariation

Identifiers

PMID36736955
PMCPMC10085823

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.