Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36736890›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of pediatrics2023

Validation of the Electronic Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers, Revised with Follow-Up: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Shana M Attar, Lauren E Bradstreet, Riane K Ramsey, Kiva Kelly, Diana L Robins

Open access · greenAbstract readControlled Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of pediatrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Shana M AttarUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: sattar@uw.edu.
Lauren E BradstreetKennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD.
Riane K RamseyThe Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Kiva KellyDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Diana L RobinsDrexel University, Philadelphia, PA.
Drexel University · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Early Detection of Pervasive Developmental DisordersR01HD039961 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT STORRS · PI ROBINS, DIANA L · 2002 to 2018
$11.5M
Sleep and Circadian Dysfunction, Brain and Neurobehavioral Development in AutismP50HD103538 · NICHD · HUGO W. MOSER RES INST KENNEDY KRIEGER · PI S. Ali Fatemi, Bradley L Schlaggar · 2020 to 2026
$9.9M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103538NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD039961
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the classification rates and screening properties, including sensitivity and specificity, of the web-based Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddler, Revised with Follow-Up (M-CHAT-R/F) compared with paper-phone administration, and to determine the extent to which electronic M-CHAT-R/F streamlines screening, increases screening fidelity, increases diagnostic evaluation participation, and decreases waiting time from screening to evaluation compared with paper-phone modality. STUDY

designPrimary-care practices in urban and suburban settings administered either the web-based or paper-phone M-CHAT-R/F using a prospective nonrandomized control design. Toddlers (n = 17 900) were screened between 2009 and 2016 at routine well-child check-ups. Toddlers who screened at risk on the M-CHAT-R/F were invited to complete diagnostic evaluations; 176 children were diagnosed with autism. The χ

resultsClassification rates of the initial M-CHAT-R into low, medium, and high risk were significantly different across modalities with very small effect sizes. Sensitivity and specificity were high across both modalities. For children in the medium-risk range, the web-based modality had a greater rate of predicting risk for autism after Follow-Up compared with the paper-phone modality, and the web eliminated delay between initial screen and Follow-Up. The web-based modality showed increased screening fidelity, no data loss, and similar rates of evaluation attendance and time to evaluation from Follow-Up administration.

conclusionsThe web-based M-CHAT-R/F is a valid tool for universal autism screening. Systems-level decisions should balance the increased feasibility of the electronic administration with the increase in Follow-Up accuracy provided by skilled clinician interview.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderAutistic DisorderChecklistChild, PreschoolHumansInfantMass ScreeningProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityASDautismdiagnosisdigital healthimplementationscreeningtechnologyuniversal screening

Identifiers

PMID36736890
PMCPMC10390646
OpenAlexW4318761834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.