ArticleActa neurochirurgica1987
Brainstem auditory evoked response and vestibulo-ocular reflex in severe head injury patients. A prospective study of 60 cases.
Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 1987. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Single photon emission computed tomography scanning: A predictor of outcome in vegetative state of head injury.Journal of neurosciences in rural practice · 2011Article
- Predictive value of brain-stem auditory evoked potentials in children with post-traumatic coma produced by diffuse brain injury.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 1995Article
- Effect of CSF shunt on brainstem auditory evoked potential in hydrocephalus secondary to brain tumour.Acta neurochirurgica · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brainstem auditory evoked response (BAER) performed in 60 serious head injury patients, over the last two year period at All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi have been analysed, to correlate the findings with ultimate outcome. All patients included in this study were unconscious, not following any command at the time of initial evaluation, mostly within 48 hours of injury. Repeat studies were performed in surviving patients. Computerized cranial tomography was performed to establish the nature of the intracranial pathology. The clinical status and cold caloric responses were recorded in all. The patients were followed up for 1 to 24 months. Three patients had extradural haematoma, 2 patients had subdural haematoma and 30 patients had intracerebral contusion/haematoma. Brain oedema was recorded in 14 cases. BAER was normal in 32 patients and 26 of them had good recovery (81%). Three patients with normal BAER died. Abnormal BAER was recorded in 21 patients and only 50% of them had good recovery and 25% of them died. In 7 patients BAER was absent and only 2 (29%) had a good recovery. Thus 48 out of 60 patients (66%) had a good recovery and 11 (18%) died. When compared to cold caloric response, 87% patients with normal caloric response had a good recovery and 5 out of 6 patients with absent caloric response died and remaining 1 left in a vegetative state. Thus the caloric response is at least as good a prognostic factor as BAER.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.