ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2023
Explainable synthetic image generation to improve risk assessment of rare pediatric heart transplant rejection.
Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systematic review of generative adversarial networks (GANs) in cell microscopy: Trends, practices, and impact on image augmentation.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Article
- Artificial intelligence optimizes immune rejection prediction and management in heart transplantation: a structured narrative review.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- An In-depth overview of artificial intelligence (AI) tool utilization across diverse phases of organ transplantation.Journal of translational medicine · 2025Review
- Revolutionizing Cardiology through Artificial Intelligence-Big Data from Proactive Prevention to Precise Diagnostics and Cutting-Edge Treatment-A Comprehensive Review of the Past 5 Years.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence Advances in Transplant Pathology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Expert microscopic analysis of cells obtained from frequent heart biopsies is vital for early detection of pediatric heart transplant rejection to prevent heart failure. Detection of this rare condition is prone to low levels of expert agreement due to the difficulty of identifying subtle rejection signs within biopsy samples. The rarity of pediatric heart transplant rejection also means that very few gold-standard images are available for developing machine learning models. To solve this urgent clinical challenge, we developed a deep learning model to automatically quantify rejection risk within digital images of biopsied tissue using an explainable synthetic data augmentation approach. We developed this explainable AI framework to illustrate how our progressive and inspirational generative adversarial network models distinguish between normal tissue images and those containing cellular rejection signs. To quantify biopsy-level rejection risk, we first detect local rejection features using a binary image classifier trained with expert-annotated and synthetic examples. We converted these local predictions into a biopsy-wide rejection score via an interpretable histogram-based approach. Our model significantly improves upon prior works with the same dataset with an area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 98.84% for the local rejection detection task and 95.56% for the biopsy-rejection prediction task. A biopsy-level sensitivity of 83.33% makes our approach suitable for early screening of biopsies to prioritize expert analysis. Our framework provides a solution to rare medical imaging challenges currently limited by small datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.