Observational studySchizophrenia research2023
Epidemiology of infection, transmission and COVID-19 outcomes among mental health users and workers in a comprehensive network of long-term mental health facilities: Retrospective observational population-base study.
Observational study in Schizophrenia research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Aripiprazole as protector against COVID-19 mortality.Scientific reports · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA high Coronavirus Disease 19 (COVID-19) morbidity and mortality have been reported among users and workers of long-term care facilities. The main objective of this work was to explore the prevalence and temporal pattern of COVID-19 in comprehensive network of long-term mental health facilities in Spain. Secondly, we aimed to estimate the effect of having a severe mental health diagnosis on prevalence and COVID-19 outcomes.
methodsA cohort of 2552 participants were followed-up over a one-year. Sociodemographic and clinical data related to COVID-19 were recollected using a proforma. Frequency analyses were used to determine the prevalence of COVID-19 disease. Multivariable binary regression models sequentially adjusted by gender and age were employed to explore the potential role of severe mental health diagnosis on COVID-19 outcomes.
resultsWorkers had higher risk of testing positive than mental health users (odds ratio [OR] 1.57 [95 % CI 1.01-2.43; p < 0.05] who presented an equivalent risk of testing positive after accounting for age and gender (OR 1.62 [95 % CI 0.98-2.66; p = 0.06].
conclusionsThe significant lower prevalence of COVID-19 among mental health users could be explained by the measures implemented to prevent COVID-19 as well as by the possible role that antipsychotic treatment could play in the prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.