Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36736066›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection and public health2023

Comparative analysis of long-term self-reported COVID-19 symptoms among pregnant women.

Jorge Vásconez-González, Raul Fernandez-Naranjo, Juan S Izquierdo-Condoy, Karen Delgado-Moreira, Simone Cordovez, Andrea Tello-De-la-Torre, Clara Paz, Diana Castillo, Nathaly Izquierdo-Condoy, Sarah J Carrington and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection and public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jorge Vásconez-GonzálezOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Américas, 170137 Quito, Ecuador; Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Tecnologias PUCE-TEC, Quito 170143, Ecuador.
Raul Fernandez-NaranjoOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Américas, 170137 Quito, Ecuador.
Juan S Izquierdo-CondoyOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Américas, 170137 Quito, Ecuador; Health Management and Research Area, Universidad Internacional Iberoamericana, Arecibo 00613, Puerto Rico.
Karen Delgado-MoreiraOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Américas, 170137 Quito, Ecuador.
Simone CordovezOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Américas, 170137 Quito, Ecuador.
Andrea Tello-De-la-TorreOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Américas, 170137 Quito, Ecuador.
Clara PazOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Américas, 170137 Quito, Ecuador.
Diana CastilloOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Américas, 170137 Quito, Ecuador.
Nathaly Izquierdo-CondoyGynecology and Obstetrics Service, Hospital Luis Gabriel Dávila, 040103 Tulcan, Ecuador.
Sarah J CarringtonOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Américas, 170137 Quito, Ecuador.
Esteban Ortiz-PradoOne Health Research Group, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad de Las Américas, 170137 Quito, Ecuador. Electronic address: e.ortizprado@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe negative effects of COVID-19 infections during pregnancy have been amply described, however, the persistent sequels of this infection have not been explored so far.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to describe persisting symptoms after COVID-19 infection in pregnant and non-pregnant women in Ecuador.

methodsA cross-sectional analysis based on an online, self-reporting questionnaire was conducted in Ecuador from April to July 2022. Participants were invited by social media, radio, and TV to voluntarily participate in our study. A total of 457 surveys were included in this study. We compared risk factor variables and long-term persisting symptoms of pregnant and non-pregnant women in Ecuador.

resultsOverall, 247 (54.1 %) responders claimed to have long-term symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Most of these symptoms were reported by non-pregnant women (94.0 %). The most common Long-COVID symptoms in pregnant women were fatigue (10.6 %), hair loss (9.6 %), and difficulty concentrating (6.2 %). We found that pregnant women who smoked had a higher risk of suffering fatigue.

conclusionsThe most frequent Long-COVID symptoms in pregnant women were fatigue, hair loss, and difficulty concentrating. Apparently, the patterns of presentation of long-term sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnant women do not differ significantly from reports available from studies in the general population.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy Complications, InfectiousCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromePregnancySARS-CoV-2Self ReportCOVID-19Long-COVIDPregnancySARS-CoV-2SequalaeWomen

Identifiers

PMID36736066
PMCPMC9851727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.