Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36735652›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Blood pressure monitoring during anesthesia induction using PPG morphology features and machine learning.

Clémentine Aguet, João Jorge, Jérôme Van Zaen, Martin Proença, Guillaume Bonnier, Pascal Frossard, Mathieu Lemay

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clémentine AguetSignal Processing Group, Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5455-9369
João JorgeSignal Processing Group, Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Jérôme Van ZaenSignal Processing Group, Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Martin ProençaSignal Processing Group, Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Guillaume BonnierSignal Processing Group, Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Pascal FrossardSignal Processing Laboratory (LTS4), Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.
Mathieu LemaySignal Processing Group, Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (CSEM), Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Swiss Center for Electronics and Microtechnology (Switzerland) · CHÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood pressure (BP) is a crucial biomarker giving valuable information regarding cardiovascular diseases but requires accurate continuous monitoring to maximize its value. In the effort of developing non-invasive, non-occlusive and continuous BP monitoring devices, photoplethysmography (PPG) has recently gained interest. Researchers have attempted to estimate BP based on the analysis of PPG waveform morphology, with promising results, yet often validated on a small number of subjects with moderate BP variations. This work presents an accurate BP estimator based on PPG morphology features. The method first uses a clinically-validated algorithm (oBPM®) to perform signal preprocessing and extraction of physiological features. A subset of features that best reflects BP changes is automatically identified by Lasso regression, and a feature relevance analysis is conducted. Three machine learning (ML) methods are then investigated to translate this subset of features into systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) estimates; namely Lasso regression, support vector regression and Gaussian process regression. The accuracy of absolute BP estimates and trending ability are evaluated. Such an approach considerably improves the performance for SBP estimation over previous oBPM® technology, with a reduction in the standard deviation of the error of over 20%. Furthermore, rapid BP changes assessed by the PPG-based approach demonstrates concordance rate over 99% with the invasive reference. Altogether, the results confirm that PPG morphology features can be combined with ML methods to accurately track BP variations generated during anesthesia induction. They also reinforce the importance of adding a calibration measure to obtain an absolute BP estimate.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure DeterminationPhotoplethysmographyAnesthesia, GeneralBlood PressureHumansMachine Learning

Identifiers

PMID36735652
PMCPMC9897516
OpenAlexW4319059302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.