Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36735420›Full record

SynthesisUrogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.)2023

Barriers to Urogynecologic Care for Racial and Ethnic Minority Women: A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Mary F Ackenbom, Charelle M Carter-Brooks, Sarin A Soyemi, Carrie K Everstine, Meryl A Butters, Esa M Davis

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Urogynecology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Health Inequalities in Urogynaecology.International urogynecology journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mary F Ackenbom
Charelle M Carter-BrooksDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Sarin A SoyemiSUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY.
Carrie K EverstineLibrary Services, UPMC Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA.
Meryl A ButtersDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
Esa M DavisDepartment of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

Evaluating the association between surgery and subsequent cognitive function, everyday functioning, and independenceK23AG073517 · NIA · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ACKENBOM, MARY · 2021 to 2023
$507k
A Prospective Examination of Perioperative Neurocognitive Disorders in Older Women Undergoing Urogynecologic SurgeryR03AG064378 · NIA · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ACKENBOM, MARY · 2019 to 2020
$259k
NIA NIH HHS K23 AG073517NIA NIH HHS R03 AG064378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceStudies have sought to evaluate factors that have perpetuated disparities in health care, including urogynecologic care. However, there remains a lack of understanding of barriers to care specific to racial/ethnic minority populations.

objectivesWe aimed to report identified barriers to urogynecologic care (eg, care for symptoms/diagnoses of urinary incontinence [UI], accidental bowel leakage [ABL], and pelvic organ prolapse [POP]) for underrepresented racial and ethnic minority (URM) women in the United States. STUDY

designWe conducted a systematic search for studies through 5 electronic bibliographic databases. Inclusion criteria for eligible studies included the following: (1) studies reporting barriers to care for those with urogynecologic symptoms/diagnoses, (2) publication date year 2000 or later. Exclusion criteria included study cohorts with children, exclusively non-U.S. populations, cohorts without URM participants, and studies without qualitative research methodology. Study methodology, characteristics, as well as barriers and facilitators to urogynecologic care were captured using a thematic synthesis approach.

resultsThere were 360 studies identified. Twelve studies met criteria: 6 had study populations with UI, 3 with POP, 2 on UI and/or POP, and 1 on ABL. There were 7 focus group studies (total 44 groups, n = 330), 4 interview studies (total 160 interviews, n = 160), and 1 had both (10 interviews, 6 groups, n = 39). Most studies reported on patient-associated barriers (n = 10/12) and physician/provider-associated barriers (n = 10/12), whereas only half reported system-associated barriers (n = 6/12).

conclusionIdentified barriers to urogynecologic care for URM populations were examined. Findings likely do not fully reflect barriers to urogynecologic care for URM populations. Comprehensive evaluation of social determinants of health and systemic racism within studies is needed to understand the unique barriers present for racially/ethnically diverse populations.

Indexed as

EthnicityUrinary IncontinenceChildDelivery of Health CareEthnic and Racial MinoritiesFemaleHumansMinority GroupsRacial GroupsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36735420
PMCPMC10243232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.