ArticleJAMA network open2023
Assessment of Cancer Predisposition Syndromes in a National Cohort of Children With a Neoplasm.
Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic yield of cancer predisposition in a nationwide prospective childhood acute leukemia cohort.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Challenges in identifying paediatric cancer predisposition syndromes: international SCOPE survey and SIOPE expert consensus recommendations.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Risk of subsequent primary melanoma in 68 002 five-year survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer in Europe: the PanCareSurFup cohort study.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2026Article
- Clinical Impact of Germline Multigene Sequencing in Pediatric Cohorts with a Wide Spectrum of Neoplasms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Health-related quality of life in children with multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN) and their siblings.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Article
- Epidemiology of Childhood Cancer and Cancer Predisposition Syndromes (CPSs): A 20-Year Single-Center Cohort from the Greater Poland Region.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- "I don't think I even thought of myself" A mixed-methods study of family experiences of trio germline whole genome sequencing in newly diagnosed childhood cancer.British journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Adolescents' Experiences With Sequencing for Genetic Predisposition in Pediatric Cancer: A Quantitative Study.Psycho-oncology · 2026Article
- Germline variants observed in pediatric cancer patients related to hereditary breast and ovarian cancer in adults.International journal of cancer · 2025Article
- Clinical challenges of cancer predisposition syndromes with pediatric central nervous system tumors: a single-center study.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Article
- Parental perspectives on the use of tumor molecular profiling and germline genetic testing during their children's cancer treatment.Familial cancer · 2025Article
- A coordinated multidisciplinary model of care is needed for child and family centered care in pediatric genetic cancer risk services: a scoping review.Familial cancer · 2025Article
- Preface : Invited Issue Editor, Professor Tai-Tong Wong and the Cancer Predisposition Syndrome.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2025Article
- Family-Level Impact of Germline Genetic Testing in Childhood Cancer: A Multi Family Member Interview Analysis.Cancers · 2025Article
- Delivering Trio Germline Whole Genome Sequencing to Patients Newly Diagnosed With Childhood Cancer: Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives of the PREDICT Study.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Non-malignant features of cancer predisposition syndromes manifesting in childhood and adolescence: a guide for the general pediatrician.World journal of pediatrics : WJP · 2025Review
- Editorial: New insights into cancer predisposition syndromes in pediatric hematology-oncology.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Pediatric cancer predisposition syndromes involving non-central nervous system solid pediatric tumors: a review on their manifestations with a focus on histopathology.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025Review
- Cancer risk in individuals with polydactyly: a Swedish population-based cohort study.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: To improve diagnostics of cancer predisposition syndromes (CPSs) in children with cancer, it is essential to evaluate the effect of CPS gene sequencing among all children with cancer and compare it with genetic testing based on clinical selection. However, a reliable comparison is difficult because recent reports on a phenotype-first approach in large, unselected childhood cancer cohorts are lacking. Objective: To describe a national children's cancer center's experience in diagnosing CPSs before introducing routine next-generation sequencing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at the National Retinoblastoma Treatment Center (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and the Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology (Utrecht, Netherlands) and included Dutch pediatric patients with a new diagnosis of neoplasm between June 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. Follow-up was at least 18 months after neoplasm diagnosis. Data analysis was conducted from July 2021 to February 2022. Exposures: As part of routine diagnostics, pediatric oncologists and ophthalmologists checked for characteristics of CPSs and selected children for referral to clinical geneticists and genetic testing. Main Outcomes and Measures: Detected cancer predisposition syndromes. Results: A total of 824 patients (median [range] age at diagnosis 7.5 [0-18.9] years; 361 girls [44%]) were assessed, including 335 children with a hematological neoplasm (41%) and 489 (59%) with a solid tumor. In 71 of 824 children (8.6%), a CPS was identified, of which most (96%) were identified by a phenotype-driven approach. Down syndrome and neurofibromatosis type 1 were the most common CPSs diagnosed. In 42 of 71 patients (59%), a CPS was identified after these children developed a neoplasm. The specific type of neoplasm was the most frequent indicator for genetic testing, whereas family history played a minor role. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of children with a neoplasm, the prevalence of CPSs identified by a phenotype-driven approach was 8.6%. The diagnostic approach for identifying CPSs is currently shifting toward a genotype-first approach. Future studies are needed to determine the diagnostic value, as well as possible disadvantages of CPS gene sequencing among all children with cancer compared with the phenotype-driven approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.