Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36735253›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Estimation of Vaccine Effectiveness of CoronaVac and BNT162b2 Against Severe Outcomes Over Time Among Patients With SARS-CoV-2 Omicron.

Yuchen Wei, Katherine Min Jia, Shi Zhao, Chi Tim Hung, Chris Ka Pun Mok, Paul Kwok Ming Poon, Eman Yee Man Leung, Maggie Haitian Wang, Carrie Ho Kwan Yam, Tsz Yu Chow and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yuchen WeiSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Katherine Min JiaCenter for Communicable Disease Dynamics, Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Shi ZhaoSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chi Tim HungSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chris Ka Pun MokSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Paul Kwok Ming PoonSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Eman Yee Man LeungSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Maggie Haitian WangSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Carrie Ho Kwan YamSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Tsz Yu ChowSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Zihao GuoSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Eng Kiong YeohSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Ka Chun ChongSchool of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · CNCenter for Disease Dynamics, Economics & Policy · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Few studies have evaluated the waning of vaccine effectiveness against severe outcomes caused by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection. Hong Kong is providing inactivated and mRNA vaccines, but the population had limited protection from natural infections before the Omicron variant emerged. Objective: To examine the change in vaccine effectiveness against hospitalization and mortality due to the Omicron variant over time. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study included adults with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infection who died or were hospitalized in Hong Kong from January 1 to June 5, 2022 (ie, case participants), and adults with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron, sampled from the public health registry during the study period (ie, control participants), who were matched to case participants by propensity score. Exposures: Vaccination status of the individuals. Main Outcomes and Measures: Estimated vaccine effectiveness against death, death or hospitalization, and death among hospitalized patients. Vaccine effectiveness was calculated as 1 - adjusted odds ratio obtained by conditional logistic regression adjusted with covariates for each period following vaccination. Results: There were 32 823 case participants (25 546 [77.8%] ≥65 years; 16 930 [47.4%] female) and 131 328 control participants (100 041 [76.2%] ≥65 years; 66 625 [46.6%] female) in the sample analyzed for the death or hospitalization outcome. Vaccine effectiveness against death or hospitalization was maintained for at least 6 months after the second dose of both CoronaVac (74.0%; 95% CI, 71.8%-75.8%) and BNT162b2 (77.4%; 95% CI, 75.5%-79.0%) vaccines. Vaccine effectiveness against death in those aged 18 to 49 years was 86.4% (95% CI, 85.8%-87.0%) and 92.9% (95% CI, 92.6%-93.2%) for those receiving 2 doses of CoronaVac and BNT162b2, respectively, while for patients aged 80 years or older, it dropped to 61.4% (95% CI, 59.8%-63.2%) and 52.7% (95% CI, 50.2%-55.6%) for CoronaVac and BNT162b2, respectively. Nevertheless, overall vaccine effectiveness against death at 4 to 6 months after the third dose was greater than 90% for CoronaVac, BNT162b2, and the mixed vaccine schedule (eg, mixed vaccines: vaccine effectiveness, 92.2%; 95% CI, 89.2%-95.1%). Conclusions and Relevance: While vaccines were generally estimated to be effective against severe outcomes caused by SARS-CoV-2 Omicron infection, this analysis found that protection in older patients was more likely to wane 6 months after the second dose. Hence, a booster dose is recommended for older patients to restore immunity. This is especially critical in a setting like Hong Kong, where third-dose coverage is still insufficient among older residents.

Indexed as

BNT162 VaccineCOVID-19AdultAgedCase-Control StudiesCOVID-19 VaccinesFemaleHumansMaleSARS-CoV-2Vaccine EfficacyVaccines, InactivatedBNT162 VaccineCOVID-19 Vaccinessinovac COVID-19 vaccineVaccines, Inactivated

Identifiers

PMID36735253
PMCPMC9898822
OpenAlexW4319057949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.