Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36735059›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of colorectal disease2023

Outcomes of complex colorectal polyps managed by multi-disciplinary team strategies-a multi-centre observational study.

J Parker, S Gupta, L Shenbagaraj, P Harborne, R Ramaraj, S Karandikar, M Mottershead, J Barbour, N Mohammed, M Lockett and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of colorectal disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Temporal trends in colorectal resections for benign colorectal neoplasia: A retrospective cohort study of the ACS-NSQIP 2016-2022.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

J ParkerSchool of Medicine and Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK. parkerjl@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8334-4989
S GuptaGuy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
L ShenbagarajUnited Lincolnshire Hospital Trust, Lincoln, UK.
P HarborneCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
R RamarajCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
S KarandikarUniversity Hospitals Birmingham Foundation NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
M MottersheadUniversity Hospitals Birmingham Foundation NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
J BarbourGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.
N MohammedLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust and University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
M LockettNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
A LyonsNorth Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
R VegaUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
J TorkingtonCardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
S DolwaniSchool of Medicine and Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Cardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBNorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust · GBUnited Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTeam management strategies for complex colorectal polyps are recommended by professional guidelines. Multi-disciplinary meetings are used across the UK with limited information regarding their impact. The aim of this multi-centre observational study was to assess procedures and outcomes of patients managed using these approaches.

methodThis was a retrospective, observational study of patients managed by six UK sites. Information was collected regarding procedures and outcomes including length of stay, adverse events, readmissions and cancers.

resultsTwo thousand one hundred ninety-two complex polyps in 2109 patients were analysed with increasing referrals annually. Most presented symptomatically and the mean polyp size was 32.1 mm. Primary interventions included endoscopic therapy (75.6%), conservative management (8.3%), colonic resection (8.1%), trans-anal surgery (6.8%) or combined procedures (1.1%). The number of primary colonic resections decreased over the study period without a reciprocal increase in secondary procedures or recurrence. Secondary procedures were required in 7.8%. The median length of stay for endoscopic procedures was 0 days with 77.5% completed as day cases. Median length of stay was 5 days for colonic resections. Overall adverse event and 30-day readmission rates were 9.0% and 3.3% respectively. Malignancy was identified in 8.8%. Benign polyp recurrence occurred in 13.1% with a median follow up of 30.4 months. Screening detected lesions were more likely to undergo bowel resection. Colonic resection was associated with longer stays, higher adverse events and more cancers on final histology.

conclusionMulti-disciplinary team management of complex polyps is safe and effective. Standardisation of organisation and quality monitoring is needed to continue positive effects on outcomes and services.

Indexed as

Colonic PolypsColonColonoscopyHumansReferral and ConsultationRetrospective StudiesDecision-makingLarge or complex colorectal polypMulti-disciplinary team managementOutcomes

Identifiers

PMID36735059
PMCPMC9898359
OpenAlexW4319063495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.