Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36734538›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2023

Updating international consensus on best practice in care of the dying: A Delphi study.

Tamsin McGlinchey, Rebecca Early, Stephen Mason, Carl Johan-Fürst, Lia van Zuylen, Susie Wilkinson, John Ellershaw

Erratum issuedFull text readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Learning from end-of-life injectable medication patient safety incidents in the community: a mixed-methods analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. End-of-Life Care in an Acute Neurological Ward: A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Practices During the Last Week of Life.The Journal of neuroscience nursing : journal of the American Association of Neuroscience Nurses
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tamsin McGlincheyPalliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6245-4225
Rebecca EarlyPalliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Stephen MasonPalliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4020-6869
Carl Johan-FürstThe Institute for Palliative Care, Lund University and Region Skåne, Lund, Sweden.
Lia van ZuylenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre's, Cancer Centrum Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Susie WilkinsonPalliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
John EllershawPalliative Care Unit, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGood care of the dying has been defined as being able to die in the place of your choice, free from pain, cared for with dignity and supported by the best possible care. This definition underpinned the development of the '10/40 Model' of care for the dying, in 2013. The model includes 10 'Key Principles' that underpin 40 'Core Outcomes' of care. It was necessary to update consensus on the 10/40 Model to ensure that it remains clinically relevant and applicable for practice.

aimUpdate international consensus on the content of the 10/40 Model.

designDelphi study utilising questionnaire completion; each round informed the need for, and content of the next. Free text comments were also sought. Three rounds of Delphi were undertaken. SETTING/

participantsA total of 160 participants took part in round 1, representing 31 countries; 103 in round 2 and 57 in round 3. Participants included doctors, nurses, researchers and allied health professionals, with over 80% working predominantly in palliative care (general/specialist not specified).

resultsMinor amendments were made to seven items related to: recognition of the dying phase, ongoing assessment of the patient's condition, communication with patients about the plan of care and care in the immediate time after the death of a patient. Results supported the addition of a sub core outcome for care provided after death.

conclusionThe updated 10/40 Model will guide the delivery of high-quality care for dying patients regardless of the location of care. Further work should focus on increasing lay participation and participation from low income and culturally diverse countries.

Indexed as

Palliative CarePatientsDelphi TechniqueHumansQuality of Health Careconsensus developmentDelphi methodPalliative carequality of careterminal care

Identifiers

PMID36734538
PMCPMC10021119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read47
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.