ArticleAnaesthesiology intensive therapy2022
The effects of hydroxyethyl starch and gelatine on lung tissue and coagulation during the resuscitation of rats with traumatic haemorrhagic shock.
Article in Anaesthesiology intensive therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Severe trauma care: advances and future directions in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and information technology support.Medical review (2021) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis study was constructed to compare the effects of resuscitation with gelatine and hydroxyethyl starch (HES) on coagulopathy, haemodynamics, and tissue damage during an uncontrolled haemorrhagic shock model in rats. MATERIAL AND
methodsTwenty 6-month-old Sprague-Dawley rats were included in the study and divided into 4 groups. There was no haemorrhage in the sham group. The others were randomised into haemorrhage without volume replacement (control group), haemorrhage and gelatine (group G), and haemorrhage and HES (group V). Blood samples for thromboelastogram and annexin 5 values were obtained before bleeding and after resuscitation.
resultsIn the control group, R (16.18 ± 2.74) and K (5.8 ± 1.1) were significantly higher than in all other groups ( P = 0.001), and the TEG alpha angle was 39.54 ± 5.94°, which was found to be significantly lower than in the sham group ( P = 0.001). In group V, the TEG MA value was found to be significantly lower at 30.54 ± 8.89 ( P = 0.001). The annexin A5 value was significantly higher in the control group, group V, and group G than in the sham group and was highest in the control group ( P = 0.001). Lung damage score measurement was 0.60 ± 0.19 in the control group, higher than in the gelatine and HES groups ( P = 0.001).
conclusionsLung tissue damage and coagulation were positively affected by HES or gelatine resuscitation. A reduction in clot formation in the HES group might be observed due to the possible negative effect on platelets. Therefore, we concluded that the use of gelatine might be advantageous until blood transfusion is initiated in traumatic haemorrhagic shock.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.