Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36734363›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2023

Stage, treatment and survival of low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma in the Netherlands: A nationwide study.

Koen De Decker, Hans H B Wenzel, Joost Bart, Maaike A van der Aa, Roy F P M Kruitwagen, Hans W Nijman, Arnold-Jan Kruse

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Molecular changes driving low-grade serous ovarian cancer and implications for treatment.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Koen De DeckerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2430-6501
Hans H B WenzelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4502-2724
Joost BartDepartment of Pathology and Medical Biology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Maaike A van der AaDepartment of Research & Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Roy F P M KruitwagenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1305-9541
Hans W NijmanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Arnold-Jan KruseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLIsala · NLMaastricht University · NLNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSerous ovarian carcinomas constitute the largest group of epithelial ovarian cancer (60%-75%) and are further classified into high- and low-grade serous carcinoma. Low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) is a relatively rare subtype (approximately 5% of serous carcinomas) and epidemiologic studies of large cohorts are scarce. With the present study we aimed to report trends in stage, primary treatment and relative survival of LGSC of the ovary in a large cohort of patients in an effort to identify opportunities to improve clinical practice and outcome of this relatively rare disease. MATERIAL AND

methodsPatients diagnosed with LGSC between 2000 and 2019 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (n = 855). Trends in FIGO stages and primary treatment were analyzed with the Cochran-Armitage trend test, and differences in and trends of 5-year relative survival were analyzed using multivariable Poisson regression.

resultsOver time, LGSC was increasingly diagnosed as stage III (39.9%-59.0%) and IV disease (5.7%-14.4%) and less often as stage I (34.6%-13.5%; p < 0.001). Primary debulking surgery was the most common strategy (76.2%), although interval debulking surgery was preferred more often over the years (10.6%-31.1%; p < 0.001). Following primary surgery, there was >1 cm residual disease in only 15/252 patients (6%), compared with 17/95 patients (17.9%) after interval surgery. Full cohort 5-year survival was 61% and survival after primary debulking surgery was superior to the outcome following interval debulking surgery (60% vs 34%). Survival following primary debulking surgery without macroscopic residual disease (73%) was better compared with ≤1 cm (47%) and >1 cm residual disease (22%). Survival following interval debulking surgery without macroscopic residual disease (51%) was significantly higher than after >1 cm residual disease (24%). Except FIGO stage II (85%-92%), survival did not change significantly over time.

conclusionsOver the years, LGSC has been diagnosed as FIGO stage III and stage IV disease more often and interval debulking surgery has been increasingly preferred over primary debulking in these patients. Relative survival did not change over time (except for stage II) and worse survival outcomes after interval debulking surgery were observed. The results support the common recommendation to perform primary debulking surgery in patients eligible for primary surgery.

Indexed as

Cystadenocarcinoma, SerousOvarian NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ovarian EpithelialFemaleHumansNeoplasm StagingNetherlandsRetrospective Studiescytoreductive surgerydebulking surgical procedureepithelialovarian cancerovarian epithelial carcinomaovarian neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID36734363
PMCPMC9951382
OpenAlexW4319059975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.