Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36734147›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of geriatric psychiatry2023

Using digital technologies to facilitate social inclusion during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of co-resident and non-co-resident family carers of people with dementia from DETERMIND-C19.

Ben Hicks, Kate Gridley, Josie Dixon, Kate Baxter, Yvonne Birks, Carmen Colclough, Anomita Karim, Rotem Perach, Elen Moseley, Alice Russell and 13 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. How did the Sudden Closures of Adult Day Services During COVID-19 Impact Dementia Care Dyads?Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Ben HicksBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6445-2415
Kate GridleySocial Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1488-4516
Josie DixonCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4772-6450
Kate BaxterSocial Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3094-9546
Yvonne BirksSocial Policy Research Unit, University of York, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4235-5307
Carmen ColcloughSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2964-7740
Anomita KarimBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Rotem PerachSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8647-4367
Elen MoseleySouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alice RussellBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Harsharon K SondhSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Bryony StoreyGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust, Gateshead, UK.
Eva TippingBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Riona Mc ArdleNewcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7959-3563
Paul DonaghyNewcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7195-4846
Margaret DangoorCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Eleanor MilesSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8375-4638
Louise RobinsonNewcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0209-2503
Jennifer RustedSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, York, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1341-6334
Harriet WaineSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Katherine WheatleyBrighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Sube BanerjeeFaculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8083-7649
DETERMIND team
Brighton and Sussex Medical School · GBUniversity of Sussex · GBNewcastle University · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of York · GBLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Plymouth · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic triggered rapid and unprecedented changes in the use of digital technologies to support people's social inclusion. We examined whether and how co-resident and non-co-resident family carers of people with dementia engaged with digital technologies during this period.

methodsThroughout November 2020-February 2021, we interviewed 42 family carers of people with dementia from our DETERMIND-C19 cohort. Preliminary analysis was conducted through Framework analysis, followed by an inductive thematic analysis.

findingsDigital technologies served as a Facilitator for social inclusion by enabling carers to counter the effects of the differing restrictions imposed on them so they could remain socially connected and form a sense of solidarity, access resources and information, engage in social and cultural activities and provide support and independence in their caring role. However, these experiences were not universal as carers discussed some Challenges for tech inclusion, which included preferences for face-to-face contact, lack of technological literacy and issues associated with the accessibility of the technology.

conclusionMany of the carers engaged with Information and Communication Technologies, and to a lesser extent Assistive Technologies, during the pandemic. Whilst carers experienced different challenges due to where they lived, broadly the use of these devices helped them realise important facets of social inclusion as well as facilitated the support they provided to the person with dementia. However, to reduce the 'digital divide' and support the social inclusion of all dementia carers, our findings suggest it is essential that services are attuned to their preferences, needs and technological abilities.

Indexed as

COVID-19DementiaCaregiversDigital TechnologyHumansPandemicsSocial InclusioncarersCOVID-19dementiadigital technologyqualitativesocial inclusion

Identifiers

PMID36734147
PMCPMC10947510
OpenAlexW4319058792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.