ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Numerical refractive index correction for the stitching procedure in tomographic quantitative phase imaging.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gigavoxel-scale multiple-scattering-aware lensless holotomography.Light, science & applications · 2026Article
- Structural, Compositional, and Dielectric State Profiling in Label-Free Single-Cell Monitoring.Small methods · 2026Review
- Numerical refractive index correction for the stitching procedure in tomographic quantitative phase imaging.Biomedical optics express · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tomographic quantitative phase imaging (QPI) lacks an absolute refractive index value baseline, which poses a problem when large dense objects extending over multiple fields of view are measured volume by volume and stitched together. Some of the measurements lack the natural baseline value that is provided by the mounting medium with a known refractive index. In this work, we discuss the problem of the refractive index (RI) baseline of individual reconstructed volumes that are deprived of access to mounting medium due to the extent of the object. The solution of this problem is provided by establishing the RI offsets based on the overlapping regions. We have proven that the process of finding the offset RI values may be justifiably reduced to the analogous procedure in the 2D baseline correction (2D-BC). Finally, we proposed the enhancement of the state-of-the-art 2D-BC procedure previously introduced in the context of 2D QPI. The processing is validated at the examples of a synthetic dataset and a liver organoid.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.