Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36733759›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2022

Coarse-scale optoretinography (CoORG) with extended field-of-view for normative characterization.

Xiaoyun Jiang, Teng Liu, Vimal Prabhu Pandiyan, Emily Slezak, Ramkumar Sabesan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. ƒ(Cell): Software for Reproducible Analysis of Optoretinograms.Translational vision science & technology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Optical Assessment of Photoreceptor Function Over the Macula.Translational vision science & technology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Xiaoyun JiangDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4733-9357
Teng LiuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Vimal Prabhu PandiyanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6996-0355
Emily SlezakDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.
Ramkumar SabesanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98109, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0895-7037
University of Washington · US

Funding

Vision Research CoreP30EY001730 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI JAMES Bryant HURLEY · 1985 to 2026
$23.5M
Optoretinography: All-optical measures of functional activity in the human retinaU01EY032055 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI PALANKER, DANIEL V, ROORDA, AUSTIN · 2021 to 2025
$5.2M
Photoreceptor mosaic in health and diseaseR01EY029710 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Ramkumar Sabesan · 2019 to 2026
$2.9M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY001730NEI NIH HHS R01 EY029710NEI NIH HHS U01 EY032055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optoretinography (ORG) has the potential to be an effective biomarker for light-evoked retinal activity owing to its sensitive, objective, and precise localization of retinal function and dysfunction. Many ORG implementations have used adaptive optics (AO) to localize activity on a cellular scale. However, the use of AO restricts field-of-view (FOV) to the isoplanatic angle, necessitating the montaging of multiple regions-of-interest to cover an extended field. In addition, subjects with lens opacities, increased eye movements and decreased mobility pose challenges for effective AO operation. Here, we developed a coarse-scale ORG (CoORG) system without AO, which accommodates FOVs up to 5.5 deg. in a single acquisition. The system is based on a line-scan spectral domain OCT with volume rates of up to 32 Hz (16,000 B-frames per second). For acquiring ORGs, 5.5 deg. wide OCT volumes were recorded after dark adaptation and two different stimulus bleaches. The stimulus-evoked optical phase change was calculated from the reflections encasing the cone outer segments and its variation was assessed vs. eccentricity in 12 healthy subjects. The general behavior of ΔOPL vs. time mimicked published reports. High trial-to-trial repeatability was observed across subjects and with eccentricity. Comparison of ORG between CoORG and AO-OCT based ORG at 1.5°, 2.5°, and 3.5° eccentricity showed an excellent agreement in the same 2 subjects. The amplitude of the ORG response decreased with increasing eccentricity. The variation of ORG characteristics between subjects and versus eccentricity was well explained by the photon density of the stimulus on the retina and the outer segment length. Overall, the high repeatability and rapid acquisition over an extended field enabled the normative characterization of the cone ORG response in healthy eyes, and provides a promising avenue for translating ORG for widespread clinical application.

Identifiers

PMID36733759
PMCPMC9872880
OpenAlexW4306168666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.