ArticleBiomedical optics express2022
Near-infrared, wavelength, and illumination scanning holographic tomography.
Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optical diffraction tomographic microscopy: a cutting-edge label-free three-dimensional bioimaging.Biophysics reports · 2026Article
- Wide-field, real-time limited-angle optical diffraction tomography using massively parallel data processing.Biomedical optics express · 2026Article
- Recent Advances and Current Trends in Transmission Tomographic Diffraction Microscopy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a holographic tomography technique in which the projections are acquired using both wavelength and illumination scanning in the near-infrared region. We show how to process the acquired data to obtain correct values of three-dimensional refractive index distributions in both single-wavelength and multi-wavelength data acquisition schemes and how to properly account for the dispersion of the sample. We perform numerical and experimental comparisons of different illumination scenarios to determine the most efficient measurement protocol. We show that the multi-wavelength protocol is advantageous in terms of signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio over single-wavelength protocols, even for the same number of projections used for reconstructions. Finally, we show that this approach is suitable for providing high-quality refractive index distributions of relatively thick colon cancer samples.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.