Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36733735›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2022

Inter-day repeatability assessment of human retinal blood flow using clinical laser speckle contrast imaging.

Chen Qiu, Josephine Situ, Sheng-Ya Wang, Ehsan Vaghefi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Chen QiuDepartment of Physiology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Josephine SituDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Sheng-Ya WangDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Ehsan VaghefiSchool of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9482-3168
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) can generate retinal blood flow maps inexpensively and non-invasively. These flow maps can be used to identify various eye disorders associated with reduced blood flow. Despite early success, one of the major obstacles to clinical adoption of LSCI is poor repeatability of the modality. Here, we propose an LSCI registration pipeline that registers contrast maps to correct for rigid movements. Post-registration, intra(same)-day and inter(next)-day repeatability are studied using various quantitative metrics. We have studied LSCI repeatability intra-day by using the coefficient of variation. Using the processing pipelines and custom hardware developed, similar repeatability was observed when compared to previously reported values in the literature. Inter-day repeatability analysis indicates no statistical evidence (p = 0.09) of a difference between flow measurements performed on two independent days. Further improvements to hardware, environmental controls, and participant control must be made to provide higher confidence in the repeatability of blood flow. However, this is the first time that repeatability across two different days (inter-day) using multiple exposure speckle imaging (MESI) has been analyzed and reported.

Identifiers

PMID36733735
PMCPMC9872875
OpenAlexW4304891669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.