ArticleForensic chemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2022
Rapid GC-MS as a Screening Tool for Forensic Fire Debris Analysis.
Article in Forensic chemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic fire debris analysis and fire investigation, 2023-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- LCMSpector: A simple open-source viewer for targeted hyphenated mass spectrometry analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Hydrocarbon forensic chemistry: exploring multiple fronts-a minireview.Forensic sciences research · 2025Article
- Rapid GC-MS method for screening seized drugs in forensic investigations: optimization and validation.Frontiers in chemistry · 2025Article
- Validation of a Rapid GC-MS Method for Forensic Seized Drug Screening Applications.Forensic chemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
- Implementation of SPME and Rapid GC-MS as a Screening Approach for Forensic Fire Debris Applications.Forensic chemistry (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Techniques developed for the screening of forensic samples can be useful for increasing sample throughput and decreasing backlog in forensic laboratories. One such technique, rapid gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS), allows for fast sample screening (≈1 min) and has gained interest in recent years for forensic applications. This work focuses on the development of a method for ignitable liquid analysis using rapid GC-MS. A sampling protocol and temperature program were developed for the analysis of these volatile samples. Using the optimized method for analysis, the limits of detection for compounds commonly found in ignitable liquids ranged from 0.012 mg/mL to 0.018 mg/mL. Once the method was developed, neat ignitable liquids (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.