Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36733451›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2023

An evolutionary explanation of female-biased sexual size dimorphism in North Sea plaice,

Fabian M Mollet, Katja Enberg, David S Boukal, Adriaan D Rijnsdorp, Ulf Dieckmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Fabian M MolletEvolution and Ecology Program and Advancing Systems Analysis Program International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3927-3332
Katja EnbergEvolution and Ecology Program and Advancing Systems Analysis Program International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0045-7604
David S BoukalDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Bergen Bergen Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8181-7458
Adriaan D RijnsdorpWageningen Marine Research IJmuiden The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0785-9662
Ulf DieckmannEvolution and Ecology Program and Advancing Systems Analysis Program International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) Laxenburg Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7089-0393
International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis · ATNorwegian Institute of Marine Research · NOWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is caused by differences in selection pressures and life-history trade-offs faced by males and females. Proximate causes of SSD may involve sex-specific mortality, energy acquisition, and energy expenditure for maintenance, reproductive tissues, and reproductive behavior. Using a quantitative, individual-based, eco-genetic model parameterized for North Sea plaice, we explore the importance of these mechanisms for female-biased SSD, under which males are smaller and reach sexual maturity earlier than females (common among fish, but also arising in arthropods and mammals). We consider two mechanisms potentially serving as ultimate causes: (a) Male investments in male reproductive behavior might evolve to detract energy resources that would otherwise be available for somatic growth, and (b) diminishing returns on male reproductive investments might evolve to reduce energy acquisition. In general, both of these can bring about smaller male body sizes. We report the following findings. First, higher investments in male reproductive behavior alone cannot explain the North Sea plaice SSD. This is because such higher reproductive investments require increased energy acquisition, which would cause a delay in maturation, leading to male-biased SSD contrary to observations. When accounting for the observed differential (lower) male mortality, maturation is postponed even further, leading to even larger males. Second, diminishing returns on male reproductive investments alone can qualitatively account for the North Sea plaice SSD, even though the quantitative match is imperfect. Third, both mechanisms can be reconciled with, and thus provide a mechanistic basis for, the previously advanced Ghiselin-Reiss hypothesis, according to which smaller males will evolve if their reproductive success is dominated by scramble competition for fertilizing females, as males would consequently invest more in reproduction than growth, potentially implying lower survival rates, and thus relaxing male-male competition. Fourth, a good quantitative fit with the North Sea plaice SSD is achieved by combining both mechanisms while accounting for sex-specific costs males incur during their spawning season. Fifth, evolution caused by fishing is likely to have modified the North Sea plaice SSD.

Indexed as

differential mortality modelenergy allocationfemale‐biased sexual size dimorphismgrowthlife‐history evolutionmaturationreproductive investmentscramble competition

Identifiers

PMID36733451
PMCPMC9885137
OpenAlexW4318473236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.