Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36733360›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in oncology2022

The impact of gum-chewing on postoperative ileus following gynecological cancer surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ya-Nan Yin, Hong Xie, Jian-Hua Ren, Ni-Jie Jiang, Li Dai

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06196138 (The Effect of Chewing Gum and Hot Compresses on Postoperative Pain, Bowel Function, and Patient Comfort After Gynecologic Oncologic Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06196138 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Chewing Gum and Hot Compresses on Postoperative Pain, Bowel Function, and Patient Comfort After Gynecologic Oncologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstanbul Medeniyet UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled84ConditionsGynecologic Nursing, PainArmsGum, Hot Compress
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ya-Nan YinDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Hong XieDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Jian-Hua RenDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ni-Jie JiangDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Li DaiDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, West China Second University Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Sichuan University · CNWest China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effect and safety of gum-chewing on the prevention of postoperative ileus after gynecological cancer surgery. Methods: We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between 2000 and 2022 in English and Chinese, using the EBSCO, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane database), PubMed, Medline (via Ovid), Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Science and Technology Journal Database, and Wan Fang databases. A total of 837 studies were screened using Endnote software, and those that met the inclusion criteria were selected for analysis. The main outcome of interest was the incidence of postoperative ileus, and secondary outcomes included time to first flatus, time to first bowel movement, and length of hospital stay. Results: Two authors extracted data and performed quality assessment independently. The review included six RCTs with a total of 669 patients. Compared with routine care, gum-chewing could significantly reduce the incidence of postoperative ileus (RR 0.46, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.72, P=0.0006), shorten the time to first flatus (WMD -9.58, 95% CI: -15.04, -4.12, Conclusions: Gum-chewing is associated with early recovery of gastrointestinal function after gynecological cancer surgery and may be an effective and harmless intervention to prevent postoperative ileus. Systemaic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/#searchadvanced, identifier CRD42022384346.

Indexed as

gastrointestinal functiongum-chewinggynecological cancer surgerymeta-analysisreview

Identifiers

PMID36733360
PMCPMC9887172
OpenAlexW4316672159

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.