Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36733282›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

The role of community and culture in abortion perceptions, decisions, and experiences among Asian Americans.

Sruthi Chandrasekaran, Katherine Key, Abby Ow, Alyssa Lindsey, Jennifer Chin, Bria Goode, Quyen Dinh, Inhe Choi, Sung Yeon Choimorrow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Parallel paths: abortion access restrictions in the USA and Iran.Contraception and reproductive medicine · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sruthi ChandrasekaranIbis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Katherine KeyIbis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Abby OwIbis Reproductive Health, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Alyssa LindseyNational Asian Pacific American Women's Forum, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jennifer ChinDivision of Complex Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.
Bria GoodeIbis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA, United States.
Quyen DinhSoutheast Asia Resource Action Center, Washington, DC, United States.
Inhe ChoiHANA Center, Chicago, IL, United States.
Sung Yeon ChoimorrowNational Asian Pacific American Women's Forum, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Ibis Reproductive Health · USAsian and Pacific Islander American Health Forum · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Culture and community can play a role in views, stigma, and access related to abortion. No research to date has documented the influence of culture and community attitudes on Asian American (AA) experiences accessing abortion care in the United States (US). This paper aims to fill gaps in research and understand how cultural and community views influence medication abortion access and experiences among AAs. Methods: We used a community-based participatory research approach, which included collaboration among experts in public health, advocates, practitioners, and community partners to understand abortion knowledge, attitudes, and experiences among AAs. Using a semi-structured interview guide, we interviewed twenty-nine eligible people of reproductive age over 18 that self-identified as Asian American or mixed race including Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and/or Pacific Islander (AANHPI), and had a medication abortion in the US between January 2016 and March 2021. Interviews were analyzed and coded in NVivo 12 using a modified grounded theory approach. Results: Participants described various influences of religion negatively impacting acceptability of abortion among their family and community. Lack of openness around sexual and reproductive health (SRH) topics contributed to stigma and influenced most participants' decision not to disclose their abortion to family members, which resulted in participants feeling isolated throughout their abortion experience. When seeking abortion care, participants preferred to seek care with providers of color, especially if they were AANHPI due to past experiences involving stigma and judgment from White providers. Based on their experiences, respondents recommended ways to improve the abortion experience for AAs in the US including, (1) more culturally aware abortion providers from one's community who better understand their needs; (2) clinics providing abortion services located in or near AA communities with signage in local languages; and (3) tailored mental health resources with culturally aware therapists. Conclusion: This study demonstrates ways in which culture and community opinions toward SRH can influence both the acceptability of abortion and experiences seeking abortion care among AAs. It is important to consider family and community dynamics among AAs to better tailor services and meet the needs of AAs seeking abortion care in the US.

Indexed as

Abortion, InducedAsianAsian American Native Hawaiian and Pacific IslanderFamilyFemaleHumansPregnancySocial StigmaUnited StatesAANHPIabortionAsian Americanimmigrant healthmedication abortionsexual and reproductive health

Identifiers

PMID36733282
PMCPMC9887147
OpenAlexW4316668863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.