Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36732815›Full record

ArticleJournal of translational medicine2023

Proteomic analysis predicts anti-angiogenic resistance in recurred glioblastoma.

Hanwool Jeon, Joonho Byun, Hayeong Kang, Kyunggon Kim, Eunyeup Lee, Jeong Hoon Kim, Chang Ki Hong, Sang Woo Song, Young-Hoon Kim, Sangjoon Chong and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hanwool Jeon *Translational Biomedical Research Group, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joonho Byun *Department of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Hayeong KangDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Kyunggon KimAsan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eunyeup LeeTranslational Biomedical Research Group, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Hoon KimDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Chang Ki HongDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sang Woo SongDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Young-Hoon KimDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Sangjoon ChongDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Hyun KimDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Brain Tumor Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Soo Jeong NamDepartment of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Ji Eun ParkDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Seungjoo LeeTranslational Biomedical Research Group, Asan Institute for Life Sciences, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea. changill@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0641-3917
Ulsan College · KRAsan Medical Center · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecurrence is common in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) because of the infiltrative, residual cells in the tumor margin. Standard therapy for GBM consists of surgical resection followed by chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but the median survival of GBM patients remains poor (~ 1.5 years). For recurrent GBM, anti-angiogenic treatment is one of the common treatment approaches. However, current anti-angiogenic treatment modalities are not satisfactory because of the resistance to anti-angiogenic agents in some patients. Therefore, we sought to identify novel prognostic biomarkers that can predict the therapeutic response to anti-angiogenic agents in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

methodsWe selected patients with recurrent GBM who were treated with anti-angiogenic agents and classified them into responders and non-responders to anti-angiogenic therapy. Then, we performed proteomic analysis using liquid-chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) with formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues obtained from surgical specimens. We conducted a gene-ontology (GO) analysis based on protein abundance in the responder and non-responder groups. Based on the LC-MS and GO analysis results, we identified potential predictive biomarkers for anti-angiogenic therapy and validated them in recurrent glioblastoma patients.

resultsIn the mass spectrometry-based approach, 4957 unique proteins were quantified with high confidence across clinical parameters. Unsupervised clustering analysis highlighted distinct proteomic patterns (n = 269 proteins) between responders and non-responders. The GO term enrichment analysis revealed a cluster of genes related to immune cell-related pathways (e.g., TMEM173, FADD, CD99) in the responder group, whereas the non-responder group had a high expression of genes related to nuclear replisome (POLD) and damaged DNA binding (ERCC2). Immunohistochemistry of these biomarkers showed that the expression levels of TMEM173 and FADD were significantly associated with the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with recurrent GBM.

conclusionsThe candidate biomarkers identified in our protein analysis may be useful for predicting the clinical response to anti-angiogenic agents in patients with recurred GBM.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkersHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProteomicsXeroderma Pigmentosum Group D ProteinAngiogenesis InhibitorsBiomarkersERCC2 protein, humanXeroderma Pigmentosum Group D ProteinAnti-angiogenic resistancePrediction biomarkerProteomics

Identifiers

PMID36732815
PMCPMC9893563
OpenAlexW4319035179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.