Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36732801›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Leveraging process mining for modeling progression trajectories in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.

Erica Tavazzi, Roberto Gatta, Mauro Vallati, Stefano Cotti Piccinelli, Massimiliano Filosto, Alessandro Padovani, Maurizio Castellano, Barbara Di Camillo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Erica TavazziDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6/b, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Roberto GattaDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25121, Brescia, Italy.
Mauro VallatiSchool of Computing and Engineering, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, UK.
Stefano Cotti PiccinelliDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25121, Brescia, Italy.
Massimiliano FilostoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25121, Brescia, Italy.
Alessandro PadovaniDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25121, Brescia, Italy.
Maurizio CastellanoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Viale Europa 11, 25121, Brescia, Italy.
Barbara Di CamilloDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Via Gradenigo 6/b, 35131, Padua, Italy. barbara.dicamillo@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8415-4688

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health RF-2016-02362405Medical Research Council MR/T041196/1Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca 2017SNW5MBUniversità degli Studi di Padova 'Research Grant (type B) - junior' initiative
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) is a neurodegenerative disease whose spreading and progression mechanisms are still unclear. The ability to predict ALS prognosis would improve the patients' quality of life and support clinicians in planning treatments. In this paper, we investigate ALS evolution trajectories using Process Mining (PM) techniques enriched to both easily mine processes and automatically reveal how the pathways differentiate according to patients' characteristics.

methodsWe consider data collected in two distinct data sources, namely the Pooled Resource Open-Access ALS Clinical Trials (PRO-ACT) dataset and a real-world clinical register (ALS-BS) including data of patients followed up in two tertiary clinical centers of Brescia (Italy). With a focus on the functional abilities progressively impaired as the disease progresses, we use two Process Discovery methods, namely the Directly-Follows Graph and the CareFlow Miner, to mine the population disease trajectories on the PRO-ACT dataset. We characterize the impairment trajectories in terms of patterns, timing, and probabilities, and investigate the effect of some patients' characteristics at onset on the followed paths. Finally, we perform a comparative study of the impairment trajectories mined in PRO-ACT versus ALS-BS.

resultsWe delineate the progression pathways on PRO-ACT, identifying the predominant disabilities at different stages of the disease: for instance, 85% of patients enter the trials without disabilities, and 48% of them experience the impairment of Walking/Self-care abilities first. We then test how a spinal onset increases the risk of experiencing the loss of Walking/Self-care ability as first impairment (52% vs. 27% of patients develop it as the first impairment in the spinal vs. the bulbar cohorts, respectively), as well as how an older age at onset corresponds to a more rapid progression to death. When compared, the PRO-ACT and the ALS-BS patient populations present some similarities in terms of natural progression of the disease, as well as some differences in terms of observed trajectories plausibly due to the trial scheduling and recruitment criteria.

conclusionsWe exploited PM to provide an overview of the evolution scenarios of an ALS trial population and to preliminary compare it to the progression observed in a clinical cohort. Future work will focus on further improving the understanding of the disease progression mechanisms, by including additional real-world subjects as well as by extending the set of events considered in the impairment trajectories.

Indexed as

Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisNeurodegenerative DiseasesDisease ProgressionHumansPrognosisQuality of LifeAmyotrophic lateral sclerosisPatient stratificationProcess discoveryProcess miningPrognosisProgression trajectories

Identifiers

PMID36732801
PMCPMC9896660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.