Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36732746›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychiatry2023

Systematic review of structured care pathways in major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder.

Helena Kyunghee Kim, Suman Banik, Muhammad Ishrat Husain, Victor Tang, Robert Levitan, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Stefan Kloiber

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Helena Kyunghee KimDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Suman BanikYorkville University, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Muhammad Ishrat HusainDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Victor TangDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Robert LevitanDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Zafiris J DaskalakisDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Stefan KloiberDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. stefan.kloiber@camh.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-6838-4114
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAYorkville University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStructured care pathways (SCPs) consist of treatment algorithms that patients advance through with the goal of achieving remission or response. These SCPs facilitate the application of current evidence and adequate treatment, which potentially benefit patients with mood disorders. The aim of this systematic review was to provide an updated synthesis of SCPs for the treatment of depressive disorders and bipolar disorder (BD).

methodPubMed, PsycINFO, and Embase were searched through June 2022 for peer-reviewed studies examining outcomes of SCPs. Eligibility criteria included being published in a peer-reviewed journal in the English language, reporting of intervention used in the SCP, and having quantitative outcomes. Studies Cochrane risk of bias tool was used to assess quality of RCTs.

resultsThirty-six studies including 15,032 patients were identified for qualitative synthesis. Six studies included patients with BD. The studies were highly heterogeneous in design, outcome measures, and algorithms. More than half of the studies reported superiority of SCPs over treatment as usual, suggesting that the standardized structure and consistent monitoring inherent in SCPs may be contributing to their effectiveness. We also found accumulating evidence supporting feasibility of SCPs in different settings, although dropout rates were generally higher in SCPs. The studies included were limited to being published in peer-reviewed journals in English language. The heterogeneity of studies did not allow quantitative evaluation.

conclusionsThe findings of our study suggest that SCPs are equally or more effective than treatment as usual in depression and BD. Further studies are required to ascertain their effectiveness, particularly for BD, and to identify factors that influence their feasibility and success.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderMajor Depressive DisorderCritical PathwaysHumansBipolar disorderMajor depressive disorderStructured care pathwaySystematic reviewTreatment algorithm

Identifiers

PMID36732746
PMCPMC9893602
OpenAlexW4319004589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.