Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36732730›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2023

Design, implementation, and evaluation of the computer-aided clinical decision support system based on learning-to-rank: collaboration between physicians and machine learning in the differential diagnosis process.

Yasuhiko Miyachi, Osamu Ishii, Keijiro Torigoe

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yasuhiko MiyachiThe Society for Computer-Aided Clinical Decision Support System, Torigoe Clinic, Ibara, Okayama, Japan. ai.diagnosis.2021@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9453-9899
Osamu IshiiThe Society for Computer-Aided Clinical Decision Support System, Torigoe Clinic, Ibara, Okayama, Japan.
Keijiro TorigoeTorigoe Clinic, Ibara, Okayama, Japan.
Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe are researching, developing, and publishing the clinical decision support system based on learning-to-rank. The main objectives are (1) To support for differential diagnoses performed by internists and general practitioners and (2) To prevent diagnostic errors made by physicians. The main features are that "A physician inputs a patient's symptoms, findings, and test results to the system, and the system outputs a ranking list of possible diseases".

methodThe software libraries for machine learning and artificial intelligence are TensorFlow and TensorFlow Ranking. The prediction algorithm is Learning-to-Rank with the listwise approach. The ranking metric is normalized discounted cumulative gain (NDCG). The loss functions are Approximate NDCG (A-NDCG). We evaluated the machine learning performance on k-fold cross-validation. We evaluated the differential diagnosis performance with validated cases.

resultsThe machine learning performance of our system was much higher than that of the conventional system. The differential diagnosis performance of our system was much higher than that of the conventional system. We have shown that the clinical decision support system prevents physicians' diagnostic errors due to confirmation bias.

conclusionsWe have demonstrated that the clinical decision support system is useful for supporting differential diagnoses and preventing diagnostic errors. We propose that differential diagnosis by physicians and learning-to-rank by machine has a high affinity. We found that information retrieval and clinical decision support systems have much in common (Target data, learning-to-rank, etc.). We propose that Clinical Decision Support Systems have the potential to support: (1) recall of rare diseases, (2) differential diagnoses for difficult-to-diagnoses cases, and (3) prevention of diagnostic errors. Our system can potentially evolve into an explainable clinical decision support system.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalGeneral PractitionersArtificial IntelligenceComputersDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMachine LearningApproximate NDCGClinical decision support systemDiagnosis decision support systemDiagnostic errorDifferential diagnosisExplainable artificial intelligenceInformation retrievalLearning to rankListwise approachRare diseases

Identifiers

PMID36732730
PMCPMC9896739
OpenAlexW4318980254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.