Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36732641›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2023

Mapping thalamic innervation to individual L2/3 pyramidal neurons and modeling their 'readout' of visual input.

Aygul Balcioglu, Rebecca Gillani, Michael Doron, Kendyll Burnell, Taeyun Ku, Alev Erisir, Kwanghun Chung, Idan Segev, Elly Nedivi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Concordant transcriptional and morphological remodeling revealed bybioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Delving into thalamic drive.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Aygul BalciogluPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Rebecca GillaniPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4510-1740
Michael DoronThe Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel.
Kendyll BurnellPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Taeyun KuPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9447-7579
Alev ErisirDepartment of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7538-7911
Kwanghun ChungPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8167-3340
Idan SegevThe Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, Jerusalem, Israel.
Elly NediviPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Cambridge, MA, USA. nedivi@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1710-0767
Broad Institute · USMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILKorea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology · KRMassachusetts General Hospital · USMcGovern Institute for Brain Research · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

A Molecular Genetic Analysis of Cortical PlasticityR01EY011894 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI NEDIVI, ELLY · 2003 to 2016
$5.2M
Characterizing excitatory synapse in vivo structural dynamicsR01EY034419 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Elly Nedivi · 2022 to 2026
$2.5M
In vivo imaging of inhibitory circuit remodeling in mouse visual cortexR01EY025437 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI NEDIVI, ELLY · 2015 to 2021
$2.5M
Inflammation mediated evolving changes in synapse structural integrity and dynamics in vivo in a mouse model of multiple sclerosisK08NS107591 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI GILLANI, REBECCA LYNN · 2018 to 2022
$867k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY011894NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025437NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034419NINDS NIH HHS K08 NS107591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The thalamus is the main gateway for sensory information from the periphery to the mammalian cerebral cortex. A major conundrum has been the discrepancy between the thalamus's central role as the primary feedforward projection system into the neocortex and the sparseness of thalamocortical synapses. Here we use new methods, combining genetic tools and scalable tissue expansion microscopy for whole-cell synaptic mapping, revealing the number, density and size of thalamic versus cortical excitatory synapses onto individual layer 2/3 (L2/3) pyramidal cells (PCs) of the mouse primary visual cortex. We find that thalamic inputs are not only sparse, but remarkably heterogeneous in number and density across individual dendrites and neurons. Most surprising, despite their sparseness, thalamic synapses onto L2/3 PCs are smaller than their cortical counterparts. Incorporating these findings into fine-scale, anatomically faithful biophysical models of L2/3 PCs reveals how individual neurons with sparse and weak thalamocortical synapses, embedded in small heterogeneous neuronal ensembles, may reliably 'read out' visually driven thalamic input.

Indexed as

NeocortexThalamusAnimalsMammalsMiceNeuronsPyramidal CellsSynapses

Identifiers

PMID36732641
PMCPMC12188690
OpenAlexW4318979794

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.