ArticleBrain topography2023
Extracting the Invisible: Mesial Temporal Source Detection in Simultaneous EEG and SEEG Recordings.
Article in Brain topography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Performance of blind source separation in localizing seizure onset from routine scalp-EEG.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Simultaneous invasive and non-invasive recordings in humans: A novel Rosetta stone for deciphering brain activity.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epileptic source detection relies mainly on visual expertise of scalp EEG signals, but it is recognised that epileptic discharges can escape to this expertise due to a deep localization of the brain sources that induce a very low, even negative, signal to noise ratio. In this methodological study, we aimed to investigate the feasibility of extracting deep mesial temporal sources that were invisible in scalp EEG signals using blind source separation (BSS) methods (infomax ICA, extended infomax ICA, and JADE) combined with a statistical measure (kurtosis). We estimated the effect of different methodological and physiological parameters that could alter or improve the extraction. Using nine well-defined mesial epileptic networks (1949 spikes) obtained from seven patients and simultaneous EEG-SEEG recordings, the first independent component extracted from the scalp EEG signals was validated in mean from 46 to 80% according to the different parameters. The three BSS methods equally performed (no significant difference) and no influence of the number of scalp electrodes used was found. At the opposite, the number and amplitude of spikes included in the averaging before the extraction modified the performance. Anyway, despite their invisibility in scalp EEG signals, this study demonstrates that deep source extraction is feasible under certain conditions and with the use of common signal analysis toolboxes. This finding confirms the crucial need to continue the signal analysis of scalp EEG recordings which contains subcortical signals that escape to expert visual analysis but could be found by signal processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
36732440What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.