Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36732437›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023

Rural Internal Medicine Residencies: Models, Facilitators, Barriers, and Equity Considerations.

Taylor Zabel, Matthew Tobey

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Faculty Development in New and Emerging Rural Residency Programs.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Taylor ZabelHarvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Matthew TobeyHarvard Medical School, Boston, USA. matthew.tobey@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-9851-6819
Harvard University · US

Funding

HRSA HHS P13RH331680100)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rural communities in the USA on average experience higher mortality rates and greater physician shortages than urban communities, especially rural communities that are historically Black, American Indian, and Alaska Native. Graduate medical education resources in the USA are concentrated within teaching hospitals in non-rural settings. The federal government has recently established several pathways to expand rural graduate medical education. In the 2010s, most of the expansion and innovation in rural graduate medical education occurred in family medicine. In the 2020s, internal medicine has also begun to increase its rural graduate medical education footprint. Rural internal medicine residency training models include Rural Track Programs (RTPs), in which training is split between urban and rural training sites. RTPs, though the cornerstone of rural residency expansion in family medicine, raise complex issues in internal medicine. We review the structure of RTPs, alternate rural residency training pathways, and the facilitators and challenges of each pathway with respect to internal medicine training.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyRural Health ServicesEducation, Medical, GraduateFamily PracticeHumansRural Populationrural communitiesrural internal medicineRural Track Programs

Identifiers

PMID36732437
PMCPMC10465446
OpenAlexW4318960861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.