Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36732300›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews2022

Onlay Versus Inlay Biceps Tenodesis for Long Head of Biceps Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Garrett R Jackson, Joshua Meade, Kyle Coombes, Bradley L Young, Nady Hamid, Dana P Piasecki, James E Fleischli, David P Trofa, Bryan M Saltzman

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Suprapectoral Onlay Biceps Tenodesis With Metal Button or Soft-Body Anchor Is Safe and Effective During Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  3. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: Inlay or onlay technique?Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Garrett R JacksonFrom the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL (Dr. Jackson); the OrthoCarolina, Charlotte, NC (Mr. Meade, Dr. Young, Dr. Hamid, Dr. Piasecki, Dr. Fleischli, and Dr. Saltzman); the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Atrium Health Musculoskeletal Institute, Charlotte, NC (Mr. Meade, Dr. Young, Dr. Hamid, Dr. Piasecki, Dr. Fleischli, and Dr. Saltzman); the American University of the Caribbean School of Medicine, Cupecoy, Sint Maarten (Mr. Coombes); and the Department of Orthopedics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY (Dr. Trofa).ORCID 0000-0002-7018-8382
Joshua Meade
Kyle Coombes
Bradley L Young
Nady Hamid
Dana P Piasecki
James E Fleischli
David P Trofa
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProximal biceps tenodesis is a common surgical treatment of tendinosis of the long head of the biceps tendon. Two of the most common techniques incorporate onlay and inlay fixation methods, which can be done arthroscopically or open and in a variety of anatomic locations. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical outcomes between onlay versus inlay humeral fixation for biceps tenodesis for long head of the biceps tendon pathology.

methodsA literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Only studies reporting outcomes and complications after onlay and inlay biceps tenodeses were included.

resultsSix studies with a total of 418 patients (252 onlay, 166 inlay) with a mean age of 56.84 years were included. Visual analog pain scale scores, Constant score, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons shoulder score did not differ. "Popeye" deformity was found in 17 patients (7.80%) in the onlay group and in 15 patients (11.28%) in the inlay group (odds ratio, 0.28; P = 0.07). No difference in postoperative cramping or failure rates was found.

conclusionBoth onlay and inlay biceps tenodeses result in improved clinical outcomes and are at low risk of Popeye deformities, with no statistically significant differences between either method. Additional studies are required to assess the clinical significance of these differences.

Indexed as

TendinopathyTenodesisArmHumansMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalTendons

Identifiers

PMID36732300
PMCPMC9746747
OpenAlexW4318964918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.