Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36732121›Full record

ArticleClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2023

Individualised Estimation of Quality-adjusted Survival Benefit and Cost-effectiveness of Proton Beam Therapy in Intermediate-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma.

D A Jones, P Candio, R Shakir, J Ramroth, J Wolstenholme, A M Gray, D J Cutter, G Ntentas

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

D A JonesNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK. Electronic address: david.jones@dph.ox.ac.uk.
P CandioNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK; Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Economics and Management, University of Trento, Trento, Italy.
R ShakirNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
J RamrothNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
J WolstenholmeNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
A M GrayNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK.
D J CutterNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK; Oxford Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
G NtentasNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, UK; Department of Medical Physics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
University of Oxford · GBKing's College London · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 21993Cancer Research UK C8225/A21133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsRadiotherapy for Hodgkin lymphoma leads to the irradiation of organs at risk (OAR), which may confer excess risks of late effects. Comparative dosimetry studies show that proton beam therapy (PBT) may reduce OAR irradiation compared with photon radiotherapy, but PBT is more expensive and treatment capacity is limited. The purpose of this study is to inform the appropriateness of PBT for intermediate-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (ISHL). MATERIALS AND

methodsA microsimulation model simulating the course of ISHL, background mortality and late effects was used to estimate comparative quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lived and healthcare costs after consolidative pencil beam scanning PBT or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), both in deep-inspiration breath-hold. Outcomes were compared for 606 illustrative patients covering a spectrum of clinical presentations, varying by two age strata (20 and 40 years), both sexes, three smoking statuses (never, former and current) and 61 pairs of OAR radiation doses from a comparative planning study. Both undiscounted and discounted outcomes at 3.5% yearly discount were estimated. The maximum excess cost of PBT that might be considered cost-effective by the UK's National Institute for Health and Care Excellence was calculated.

resultsOAR doses, smoking status and discount rate had large impacts on QALYs gained with PBT. Current smokers benefited the most, averaging 0.605 undiscounted QALYs (range -0.341 to 2.171) and 0.146 discounted QALYs (range -0.067 to 0.686), whereas never smokers benefited the least, averaging 0.074 undiscounted QALYs (range -0.196 to 0.491) and 0.017 discounted QALYs (range -0.030 to 0.086). For the gain in discounted QALYs to be considered cost-effective, PBT would have to cost at most £4812 more than VMAT for current smokers and £645 more for never smokers. This is below preliminary National Health Service cost estimates of PBT over photon radiotherapy.

conclusionIn a UK setting, PBT for ISHL may not be considered cost-effective. However, the degree of unquantifiable uncertainty is substantial.

Indexed as

Hodgkin DiseaseProton TherapyRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedAdultCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleState MedicineYoung AdultCost-effectivenessHodgkin lymphomamodellingproton beam therapyquality-adjusted life years

Identifiers

PMID36732121
PMCPMC11913763
OpenAlexW4317663690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.