Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36731921›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2023

Socioecological factors linked with pharmaceutical incentive-driven prescribing in Pakistan.

Muhammad Naveed Noor, Afifah Rahman-Shepherd, Amna Rehana Siddiqui, Wafa Aftab, Sadia Shakoor, Rumina Hasan, Mishal Khan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Muhammad Naveed NoorPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Afifah Rahman-ShepherdDepartment of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8845-9275
Amna Rehana SiddiquiCommunity Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Wafa AftabCommunity Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0001-5040-5215
Sadia ShakoorPathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Rumina Hasan *Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan.
Mishal Khan *Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK mishal.khan@lshtm.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/T02349X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmaceutical marketing through financial incentivisation to general practitioners (GPs) is a poorly studied health system problem in Pakistan. Pharmaceutical incentivisation is seen to be distorting GPs prescribing behaviour that can compromise the health and well-being of patients. We draw on a conceptual framework outlined in the ecological system theory to identify multiple factors linked with pharmaceutical incentivisation to GPs in Pakistan. We conducted qualitative interviews with 28 policy actors to seek their views on the health system dynamics, how they sustain pharmaceutical incentivisation and their effect on the quality of care. Our analysis revealed four interlinked factors operating at different levels and how they collectively contribute to pharmaceutical incentivisation. In addition to influences such as the increasing family needs and peers' financial success, sometimes GPs may naturally be inclined to maximise incomes by engaging in pharmaceutical incentivisation. On other hand, the pharmaceutical market dynamics that involve that competition underpinned by a profit-maximisation mindset enable pharmaceutical companies to meet GPs' desires/needs in return for prescribing their products. Inadequate monitoring and health regulations may further permit the pharmaceutical industry and GPs to sustain the incentive-driven relationship. Our findings have important implications for potential health reforms such as introducing regulatory controls, and appropriate monitoring and regulation of the private health sector, required to address pharmaceutical incentivisation to GPs.

Indexed as

General PractitionersMotivationHumansPakistanPharmaceutical PreparationsPharmaceutical PreparationsHealth policyHealth services researchHealth systemsPublic HealthQualitative study

Identifiers

PMID36731921
PMCPMC10175940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.