Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36731895›Full record

SynthesisJournal of gynecologic oncology2023

Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system-based therapies for early-stage endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hongyi Wei, Ningning Pan, Wen Zhang, Guangwu Xiong, Wenping Guo, Zhe Dong, Caihong Ma

Open access · diamondAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Endometrial cancer therapy in 2026.Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hongyi Wei *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1041-7953
Ningning Pan *Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5502-3881
Wen ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5763-4667
Guangwu XiongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4077-6298
Wenping GuoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4740-5537
Zhe DongDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University International Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0534-6943
Caihong MaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Reproductive Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0439-9621
Peking University · CN

Funding

Key Projects of Philosophy and Social Sciences Research 21JZD032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating the oncological and fertility outcomes of early-stage endometrial cancer (EC) treated with the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LIUS)-based regimens.

methodsThe Meta-analyses Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology statement for meta-analyses was followed. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Preprints, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from January 1990 to August 4, 2022. The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist was used for quality assessment. The primary endpoint was the complete response (CR) rate and the secondary endpoints were relapse, pregnancy, and live birth rate.

resultsA total of 25 studies (821 women) were included. The CR rate of LIUS-based regimens was 63.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]=52.3%-73.2%), with 29.6% (95% CI=23.3%-36.8%) of cases experiencing recurrence during follow-up. In sensitivity analyses, patients younger than 45 years of age with a body mass index <30 kg/m² who were treated with LIUS-based regimens achieved a high CR rate of 84.6% (95% CI=80.3%-88.1%) over a median follow-up of more than 24 months. Overall pregnancy and live birth rates were 37.9% (95% CI=24.1%-53.9%) and 39.3% (95% CI=24.0%-57.0%), respectively. No statistical differences were apparent in CR or relapse rates among the LIUS+GnRH agonist, LIUS+oral progesterone, or hysteroscopic resection followed by LIUS subgroups.

conclusionLIUS-based therapies are viable for the conservative management of early-stage endometrioid EC on CR and fertility outcome.

trial registrationPROSPERO Identifier: CRD42022352890.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, EndometrioidEndometrial NeoplasmsIntrauterine Devices, MedicatedChild, PreschoolEndometriumFemaleHumansLevonorgestrelNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPregnancyLevonorgestrelConservative ManagementEndometrial CancerFertility PreservationIntrauterine DevicesMirenaProgesterone

Identifiers

PMID36731895
PMCPMC9995869
OpenAlexW4318828452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.