SynthesisExperimental gerontology2023
A meta-analysis of RNA-Seq studies to identify novel genes that regulate aging.
Synthesis in Experimental gerontology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Interactive online tool to identify genes associated with longevity in a panel of long-lived genetic mutants inmicroPublication biology · 2026Article
- Fantastic genes and where to find them expressed in CHO.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
- Normalization and Selecting Non-Differentially Expressed Genes Improve Machine Learning Modelling of Cross-Platform Transcriptomic Data.Transactions on artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Comprehensive transcriptomic meta-analysis unveils new responsive genes to methyl jasmonate and ethylene inHeliyon · 2024Article
- An automatic measurement method for the response of Caenorhabditis elegans to chemicals.Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine · 2024Article
- HarnessingFrontiers in plant science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Aging is a ubiquitous biological process that limits the maximal lifespan of most organisms. Significant efforts by many groups have identified mechanisms that, when triggered by natural or artificial stimuli, are sufficient to either enhance or decrease maximal lifespan. Previous aging studies using the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) generated a wealth of publicly available transcriptomics datasets linking changes in gene expression to lifespan regulation. However, a comprehensive comparison of these datasets across studies in the context of aging biology is missing. Here, we carry out a systematic meta-analysis of over 1200 bulk RNA sequencing (RNASeq) samples obtained from 74 peer-reviewed publications on aging-related transcriptomic changes in C. elegans. Using both differential expression analyses and machine learning approaches, we mine the pooled data for novel pro-longevity genes. We find that both approaches identify known and propose novel pro-longevity genes. Further, we find that inter-lab experimental variance complicates the application of machine learning algorithms, a limitation that was not solved using bulk RNA-Seq batch correction and normalization techniques. Taken as a whole, our results indicate that machine learning approaches may hold promise for the identification of genes that regulate aging but will require more sophisticated batch correction strategies or standardized input data to reliably identify novel pro-longevity genes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.