Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36730436›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2023

Simulation-based inference for non-parametric statistical comparison of biomolecule dynamics.

Hippolyte Verdier, François Laurent, Alhassan Cassé, Christian L Vestergaard, Christian G Specht, Jean-Baptiste Masson

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Physics-informed deep learning for stochastic particle dynamics estimation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hippolyte VerdierInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3751, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3650-0555
François LaurentInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3751, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1615-6400
Alhassan CasséHistopathology and Bio-Imaging Group, Sanofi, R&D, Vitry-Sur-Seine, France.
Christian L VestergaardInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3751, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5329-475X
Christian G SpechtDiseases and Hormones of the Nervous System (DHNS), Inserm U1195, Université Paris-Saclay, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6038-7735
Jean-Baptiste MassonInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3751, Decision and Bayesian Computation, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5484-9056
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRSanofi (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous models have been developed to account for the complex properties of the random walks of biomolecules. However, when analysing experimental data, conditions are rarely met to ensure model identification. The dynamics may simultaneously be influenced by spatial and temporal heterogeneities of the environment, out-of-equilibrium fluxes and conformal changes of the tracked molecules. Recorded trajectories are often too short to reliably discern such multi-scale dynamics, which precludes unambiguous assessment of the type of random walk and its parameters. Furthermore, the motion of biomolecules may not be well described by a single, canonical random walk model. Here, we develop a two-step statistical testing scheme for comparing biomolecule dynamics observed in different experimental conditions without having to identify or make strong prior assumptions about the model generating the recorded random walks. We first train a graph neural network to perform simulation-based inference and thus learn a rich summary statistics vector describing individual trajectories. We then compare trajectories obtained in different biological conditions using a non-parametric maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) statistical test on their so-obtained summary statistics. This procedure allows us to characterise sets of random walks regardless of their generating models, without resorting to model-specific physical quantities or estimators. We first validate the relevance of our approach on numerically simulated trajectories. This demonstrates both the statistical power of the MMD test and the descriptive power of the learnt summary statistics compared to estimates of physical quantities. We then illustrate the ability of our framework to detect changes in α-synuclein dynamics at synapses in cultured cortical neurons, in response to membrane depolarisation, and show that detected differences are largely driven by increased protein mobility in the depolarised state, in agreement with previous findings. The method provides a means of interpreting the differences it detects in terms of single trajectory characteristics. Finally, we emphasise the interest of performing various comparisons to probe the heterogeneity of experimentally acquired datasets at different levels of granularity (e.g., biological replicates, fields of view, and organelles).

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerProteinsComputer SimulationMotionProteins

Identifiers

PMID36730436
PMCPMC9928078
OpenAlexW4318955594

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.