Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36730339›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2023

Biomarker Data from the Phase III KATHERINE Study of Adjuvant T-DM1 versus Trastuzumab for Residual Invasive Disease after Neoadjuvant Therapy for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer.

Carsten Denkert, Chiara Lambertini, Peter A Fasching, Katherine L Pogue-Geile, Max S Mano, Michael Untch, Norman Wolmark, Chiun-Sheng Huang, Sibylle Loibl, Eleftherios P Mamounas and 8 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Predictive Biomarkers of Antibody-Drug Conjugate Efficacy for Solid Tumors: Current Challenges and the Potential Role of Quantitative Proteomics.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Carsten DenkertInstitute of Pathology, Philipps University Marburg and University Hospital Marburg (UKGM), Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2249-0982
Chiara LambertiniF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4497-3296
Peter A FaschingComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, University Hospital Erlangen, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4885-8471
Katherine L Pogue-GeileNSABP Foundation/NRG Oncology, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-9855-046X
Max S ManoInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5666-5261
Michael UntchAGO-B and HELIOS Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1233-1267
Norman WolmarkNSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh/UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-7156-1110
Chiun-Sheng HuangNational Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-6557-211X
Sibylle LoiblGerman Breast Group, Neu-Isenburg, Germany; Centre for Haematology and Oncology Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6488-4958
Eleftherios P MamounasNSABP Foundation and Orlando Health Cancer Institute, Orlando, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-9476-2553
Charles E GeyerNSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh/UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0002-2379-5702
Peter C LucasNSABP Foundation and University of Pittsburgh/UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-4880-7172
Thomas BouletF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5577-4973
Chunyan SongGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3450-7147
Gail D LewisGenentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California.ORCID 0000-0001-7051-016X
Malgorzata NowickaF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5918-5981
Sanne de HaasF. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7040-8763
Mark BasikNSABP Foundation and Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-2633-5410
Roche (Switzerland) · CHUPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USAmgen (United States) · USComprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen · DEGerman Breast group · DEHelios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DEInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo · BRJewish General Hospital · CANational Taiwan University Hospital · TWNRG Oncology · USOrlando Health · USPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIn KATHERINE, adjuvant T-DM1 reduced risk of disease recurrence or death by 50% compared with trastuzumab in patients with residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) comprised of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy. This analysis aimed to identify biomarkers of response and differences in biomarker expression before and after NAT. EXPERIMENTAL

designExploratory analyses investigated the relationship between invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and HER2 protein expression/gene amplification, PIK3CA hotspot mutations, and gene expression of HER2, PD-L1, CD8, predefined immune signatures, and Prediction Analysis of Microarray 50 intrinsic molecular subtypes, classified by Absolute Intrinsic Molecular Subtyping. HER2 expression on paired pre- and post-NAT samples was examined.

resultsT-DM1 appeared to improve IDFS versus trastuzumab across most biomarker subgroups, except the HER2 focal expression subgroup. High versus low HER2 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab [HR, 2.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.32-3.11], but IDFS with T-DM1 was independent of HER2 expression level (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.56-1.83). Low PD-L1 gene expression in residual disease was associated with worse outcomes with trastuzumab (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.44-1.00), but not T-DM1 (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.59-1.87). PIK3CA mutations were not prognostic. Increased variability in HER2 expression was observed in post-NAT versus paired pre-NAT samples.

conclusionsT-DM1 appears to overcome HER2 resistance. T-DM1 benefit does not appear dependent on immune activation, but these results do not rule out an influence of the tumor immune microenvironment on the degree of response.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsB7-H1 AntigenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalTrastuzumabTumor MicroenvironmentAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineB7-H1 AntigenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID36730339
PMCPMC10102844
OpenAlexW4318926335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.