Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36730328›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Hyaluronic acid hydrogels support to generate integrated bone formation through endochondral ossification in vivo using mesenchymal stem cells.

Shintaro Yamazaki, Ryoko Hirayama, Yayoi Ikeda, Sachiko Iseki, Tetsuya Yoda, Masa-Aki Ikeda

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shintaro YamazakiDepartment of Molecular Craniofacial Embryology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Ryoko HirayamaDepartment of Molecular Craniofacial Embryology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Yayoi IkedaDepartment of Anatomy, Aichi Gakuin University School of Dentistry, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Sachiko IsekiDepartment of Molecular Craniofacial Embryology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Tetsuya YodaDepartment of Maxillofacial Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masa-Aki IkedaDepartment of Molecular Craniofacial Embryology, Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6508-2578
Tokyo Medical and Dental University · JPAichi Gakuin University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered cartilage tissue from differentiated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) can generate bone in vivo through endochondral ossification (ECO). This ECO-mediated approach has the potential to circumvent the severe problems associated with conventional MSC-based bone tissue engineering techniques that lack mechanisms to induce angiogenesis. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a key component in the cartilage extracellular matrix. However, the ECO-supporting properties of HA remain largely unclear. This study aimed to compare the ability of HA and collagen hydrogels to support in vitro differentiation of MSC-based hypertrophic cartilage tissues and to promote endochondral bone formation in vivo. Following the chondrogenic and hypertrophic differentiation in vitro, both HA and collagen constructs accumulated sulfated glycosaminoglycan (sGAG) and type 1, type II, and type X collagen. However, HA hydrogels exhibited a more uniform distribution of sGAG, type 1 collagen, type X collagen, and osteocalcin proteins; in addition, the cells embedded in the hydrogels had more rounded cell morphologies than those in the collagen constructs. At week 5 of in vitro culture, two to three constructs were implanted into a subcutaneous pocket in nude mice and harvested after 4 and 8 weeks. Both HA and collagen constructs promoted endochondral bone formation with vascularization and bone marrow development; however, the HA constructs fused to form integrated bone tissues and the bone marrow developed along the space between the two adhered grafts in all implanted pockets (n = 5). In the collagen constructs, the integration was observed in 40% of the pockets (n = 5). Microcomputer CT analysis revealed that the bone volume of HA constructs was larger than that of collagen constructs. In conclusion, compared to collagen hydrogels, HA hydrogels had superior potential to generate integrated bone with vascularization and bone marrow development. This study provides valuable insights for applying ECO-mediated bone tissue engineering approaches for the repair of critical-sized bone defects.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem CellsOsteogenesisAnimalsChondrogenesisCollagenHyaluronic AcidHydrogelsMiceMice, NudeTissue EngineeringCollagenHyaluronic AcidHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID36730328
PMCPMC9894498
OpenAlexW4318920810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.