Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36730321›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Predicting and comparing COVID-19 risk perceptions across the Netherlands and Belgium: A cross-sectional survey among university students.

Ruben D Vromans, Annemiek J Linn, Nirvi Maru, Sara Pabian, Emiel J Krahmer, Jeanine P D Guidry, Paul B Perrin, Nadine Bol

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ruben D VromansDepartment of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8040-1207
Annemiek J LinnAmsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Nirvi MaruAmsterdam School of Communication Research (ASCoR), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sara PabianDepartment of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Emiel J KrahmerDepartment of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
Jeanine P D GuidryRobertson School of Media and Culture, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
Paul B PerrinDepartment of Psychology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States of America.
Nadine BolDepartment of Communication and Cognition, Tilburg Center for Cognition and Communication (TiCC), Tilburg School of Humanities and Digital Sciences, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People's risk perception of COVID-19 is an important predictor for adopting protective behavior. Although risk perceptions, and factors influencing these, may vary between countries, less attention has been paid to differences between adjacent regions from neighboring countries. In the midst of the first wave of the corona outbreak (March-April-May 2020), we measured risk perceptions as perceived threat (consisting of perceived severity and susceptibility) among university students (N = 668) in two connected countries: the Netherlands and Belgium. Theory-based predictor variables included experiential, efficacy-related, socio-cultural, cognitive, and demographic factors. While demographic variables and country were not significant predictors of perceived threat level, all other constructs were. Personal and indirect experiences with COVID-19, as well as higher scores on personal (self) efficacy to carry out recommended preventive behaviors were all associated with higher perceived threat. However, low collective efficacy and lower levels of trust in government were both also significantly associated with higher perceived threat, as was a low level of "lack of COVID-19 knowledge". These results hold implications for suitable risk communication strategies for increasing students' COVID-19 risk perceptions.

Indexed as

COVID-19BelgiumCross-Sectional StudiesHumansNetherlandsStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversities

Identifiers

PMID36730321
PMCPMC9894432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.