Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36730273›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Variation of sensitivity of Trypanosoma evansi isolates from Isiolo and Marsabit counties of Kenya to locally available trypanocidal drugs.

Raymond E Mdachi, Kennedy O Ogolla, Joanna E Auma, Florence N Wamwiri, Richard K Kurgat, Kennedy B Wanjala, Lawrence G Mugunieri, Phylis M Alusi, Judith K Chemuliti, Phoebe W Mukiria and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Veterinary world · 2025
    Article
  4. Drug resistance in animal trypanosomiases: Epidemiology, mechanisms and control strategies.International journal for parasitology. Drugs and drug resistance · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Raymond E MdachiBiotechnology Research Institute, KALRO, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Kennedy O OgollaBiotechnology Research Institute, KALRO, Kikuyu, Kenya.ORCID 0000-0002-3438-0916
Joanna E AumaBiotechnology Research Institute, KALRO, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Florence N WamwiriBiotechnology Research Institute, KALRO, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Richard K KurgatBiotechnology Research Institute, KALRO, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Kennedy B WanjalaBiotechnology Research Institute, KALRO, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Lawrence G MugunieriBiotechnology Research Institute, KALRO, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Phylis M AlusiBiotechnology Research Institute, KALRO, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Judith K ChemulitiBiotechnology Research Institute, KALRO, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Phoebe W MukiriaBiotechnology Research Institute, KALRO, Kikuyu, Kenya.
Sylvance O OkothEast African Science and Technology Commission (EASTECO)\East African Community, Kigali, Rwanda.
Kenya Agricultural and Livestock Research Organization · KE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trypanocidal resistance is a major cause of treatment failure. This study evaluated the sensitivity of Trypanosoma evansi field isolates collected from Marsabit and Isiolo counties, Kenya. A total of 2,750 camels were screened using parasitological tests for trypanosomes. Of the screened camels, 113 tested positive from which 40 T. evansi isolates were tested using the single dose mice sensitivity test. Five treatment groups each comprising of 6 mice were inoculated intraperitoneally with 1x105 trypanosomes of each isolate and treated 24 hours later with isometamidium chloride at 1 mg/kg, homidium chloride at 1mg/kg, diminazene aceturate at 20 mg/kg and quinapyramine sulphate & chloride at 1 mg/kg. The fifth group was left untreated (positive control). The mice were monitored daily for 60 days. A survey on camel owners' practices that influence development of resistance to trypanocidal drugs was then conducted. Results indicated presence of drug resistance in all the 7 study sites that had infected camels. Seven of the isolates tested were resistant to diminazene aceturate whereas, 28, 33 and 34 were resistant to isometamidium chloride, quinapyramine sulphate & chloride and homidium chloride, respectively. Seven (17.5%) isolates of the 40 tested were sensitive to all 4 drugs, whereas, 7.5%, 10%,55% and 10% were resistant to 1,2,3 and 4 drugs, respectively. The prevalence of multiple drug resistance was 75%. Survey data indicated that camel management practices influenced the prevalence and degree of drug resistance. In conclusion, the multiple drug resistance observed in the two counties may not be an indication of total trypanocidal drug failure. Judicious treatment of confirmed trypanosomiasis cases with correct dosage would still be effective in controlling the disease since the observed resistance was at the population and not clonal level. However, integrated control of the disease and the vectors using available alternative methods is recommended to reduce drug use.

Indexed as

Trypanocidal AgentsTrypanosomaTrypanosomiasis, AfricanAnimalsCamelusChloridesDiminazeneDrug ResistanceKenyaMicePhenanthridinesChloridesDiminazenediminazene aceturatePhenanthridinesTrypanocidal Agents

Identifiers

PMID36730273
PMCPMC9894490
OpenAlexW4318911774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.