ArticlePloS one2023
Robust performance of a live bacterial therapeutic chassis lacking the colibactin gene cluster.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Engineering tumor-colonizing E. coli Nissle 1917 for detection and treatment of colorectal neoplasia.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- Stage-Specific carcinogenic mechanisms and intervention strategies for pksArchives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Global Probiotic Markets Meet Synthetic Biology: Translational Challenges andMicroorganisms · 2026Review
- Surface expression of antitoxin on engineered bacteria neutralizes genotoxic colibactin in the gut.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Towards a safer probiotic:Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Precise virulence inactivation using a CRISPR-associated transposase for combating Enterobacteriaceae gut pathogens.Nature biomedical engineering · 2025Article
- Review
- The synthesis of the novelFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Engineering bacterial theranostics: from logic gates toFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Engineered Escherichia coli for the in situ secretion of therapeutic nanobodies in the gut.Cell host & microbe · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
E. coli Nissle (EcN) is a non-pathogenic probiotic bacterium of the Enterobacteriaceae family that has been used for over a century to promote general gut health. Despite the history of safe usage of EcN, concerns have been raised regarding the presence of the pks gene cluster, encoding the genotoxin colibactin, due to its association with colorectal cancer. Here, we sought to determine the effect of pks island removal on the in vitro and in vivo robustness and activity of EcN and EcN-derived strains. A deletion of the pks island (Δpks) was constructed in wild type and engineered strains of EcN using lambda red recombineering. Mass spectrometric measurement of N-myristoyl-D-asparagine, released during colibactin maturation, confirmed that the pks deletion abrogated colibactin production. Growth curves were comparable between Δpks strains and their isogenic parents, and wild type EcN displayed no competitive advantage to the Δpks strain in mixed culture. Deletion of pks also had no effect on the activity of strains engineered to degrade phenylalanine (SYNB1618 and SYNB1934) or oxalate (SYNB8802). Furthermore, 1:1 mixed dosing of wild type and Δpks EcN in preclinical mouse and nonhuman primate models demonstrated no competitive disadvantage for the Δpks strain with regards to transit time or colonization. Importantly, there was no significant difference on in vivo strain performance between the clinical-stage strain SYNB1934 and its isogenic Δpks variant with regards to recovery of the quantitative strain-specific biomarkers d5- trans-cinnamic acid, and d5-hippuric acid. Taken together, these data support that the pks island is dispensable for Synthetic Biotic fitness and activity in vivo and that its removal from engineered strains of EcN will not have a deleterious effect on strain efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.