Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36729490›Full record

ArticleACS biomaterials science & engineering2023

Swellable and Thermally Responsive Hydrogel/Shape Memory Polymer Foam Composites for Sealing Lung Biopsy Tracts.

Matthew A Jungmann, Sarea Recalde Phillips, Tyler J Touchet, Braeden Brinson, Katherine Parish, Corinne Petersen, Sayyeda Marziya Hasan, Landon D Nash, Duncan J Maitland, Daniel L Alge

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS biomaterials science & engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Hydrogels in the clinic: An update.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matthew A JungmannDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Sarea Recalde PhillipsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Tyler J TouchetDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3981-3100
Braeden BrinsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Katherine ParishDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Corinne PetersenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Sayyeda Marziya HasanShape Memory Medical, Inc., Santa Clara, California 95054, United States.
Landon D NashShape Memory Medical, Inc., Santa Clara, California 95054, United States.
Duncan J MaitlandDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.
Daniel L AlgeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8129-2871
Texas A&M University · USShape Memory Medical (United States) · US

Funding

Biopsy Tract Sealing Device with Magnetic Resonance and X-Ray Image ContrastR01CA254964 · NCI · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI MAITLAND, DUNCAN J · 2021 to 2024
$2.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA254964
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung tissue biopsies can result in a leakage of blood (hemothorax) and air (pneumothorax) from the biopsy tract, which threatens the patient with a collapsed lung and other complications. We have developed a lung biopsy tract sealant based on a thiol-ene-crosslinked PEG hydrogel and polyurethane shape memory polymer (SMP) foam composite. After insertion into biopsy tracts, the PEG hydrogel component contributes to sealing through water-driven swelling, whereas the SMP foam contributes to sealing via thermal actuation. The gelation kinetics, swelling properties, and rheological properties of various hydrogel formulations were studied to determine the optimal formulation for composite fabrication. Composites were then fabricated via vacuum infiltration of the PEG hydrogel precursors into the SMP foam followed by thermal curing. After drying, the composites were crimped to enable insertion into biopsy tracts. Characterization revealed that the composites exhibited a slight delay in shape recovery compared to control SMP foams. However, the composites were still able to recover their shape in a matter of minutes. Cytocompatibility testing showed that leachable byproducts can be easily removed by washing and washed composites were not cytotoxic to mouse lung fibroblasts (L929s). Benchtop testing demonstrated that the composites can be easily deployed through a cannula, and the working time for deployment after exposure to water was 2 min. Furthermore, testing in an in vitro lung model demonstrated that the composites were able to effectively seal a lung biopsy tract and prevent air leakage. Collectively, these results show that the PEG hydrogel/SMP foam composites have the potential to be used as lung biopsy tract sealants to prevent pneumothorax post-lung biopsy.

Indexed as

PneumothoraxSmart MaterialsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiopsyHydrogelsMicePolyurethanesBiocompatible MaterialsHydrogelspolyurethane foamPolyurethanesSmart Materialscompositelung biopsy sealantPEG hydrogelshape memory polymer foam

Identifiers

PMID36729490
PMCPMC10726527
OpenAlexW4318935151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.