Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36729457›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2023

Clinical Importance of Clonal Hematopoiesis in Metastatic Gastrointestinal Tract Cancers.

Bill H Diplas, Ryan Ptashkin, Joanne F Chou, Shalom Sabwa, Michael B Foote, Benoit Rousseau, Guillem Argilés, James Robert White, Caitlin M Stewart, Kelly Bolton and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential Influences Breast Cancer Outcomes in a Genotype-Specific Manner.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bill H DiplasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ryan PtashkinDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Joanne F ChouDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Shalom SabwaDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Michael B FooteDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Benoit RousseauDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Guillem ArgilésDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
James Robert WhiteResphera Biosciences LLC, Baltimore, Maryland.
Caitlin M StewartMeyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.
Kelly BoltonDepartment of Medicine, Washington University Medical School, St Louis, Missouri.
Sree B ChalasaniDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Avni M DesaiDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Zoe GoldbergDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ping GuDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Jia LiDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Marina ShcherbaDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Alice ZervoudakisDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Andrea CercekDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Rona YaegerDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Neil H SegalDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
David H IlsonDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Geoffrey Y KuDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Ahmet ZehirDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Marinela CapanuDepartment of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Yelena Y JanjigianDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Luis A DiazDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Steven B MaronDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNew York Genome Center · USResphera Biosciences · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Medical Scientist Training Program Training GrantT32GM145449 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Christopher D Kontos · 2022 to 2026
$6.6M
Impact of Oncologic Therapy on Clonal Hematopoiesis and Subsequent Risk of Therapy-Related LeukemiaK08CA241318 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BOLTON, KELLY LEIGH · 2019 to 2023
$1.2M
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA241318NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM145449
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Clonal hematopoiesis (CH) has been associated with development of atherosclerosis and leukemia and worse survival among patients with cancer; however, the association with cancer therapy efficacy, in particular immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), and toxicity has not yet been established. Given the widespread use of ICB and the critical role hematopoietic stem cell-derived lymphocytes play in mediating antitumor responses, CH may be associated with therapeutic efficacy and hematologic toxicity. Objective: To determine the association between CH and outcomes, hematologic toxicity, and therapeutic efficacy in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal tract cancers being treated with systemic therapy, both in the first-line metastatic treatment setting and in ICB. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included 633 patients with stage IV colorectal (CRC) and esophagogastric (EGC) cancer who were treated with first-line chemotherapy and/or ICB at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Patients underwent matched tumor and peripheral blood DNA sequencing using the Memorial Sloan Kettering-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets next-generation sequencing assay between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2020. Exposures: Clonal hematopoiesis-related genetic alterations were identified by next-generation sequencing of patients' tumor and normal blood buffy coat samples, with a subset of these CH alterations annotated as likely putative drivers (CH-PD) based upon previously established criteria. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients with CH and CH-PD in peripheral blood samples were identified, and these findings were correlated with survival outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) during first-line chemotherapy and ICB, as well as baseline white blood cell levels and the need for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. Results: Among the 633 patients included in the study (390 men [61.6%]; median age, 58 [IQR, 48-66] years), the median age was 52 (IQR, 45-63) years in the CRC group and 61 (IQR, 53-69) years in the EGC group. In the CRC group, 161 of 301 patients (53.5%) were men, compared with 229 of 332 patients (69.0%) in the EGC group. Overall, 62 patients (9.8%) were Asian, 45 (7.1%) were Black or African American, 482 (76.1%) were White, and 44 (7.0%) were of unknown race or ethnicity. Presence of CH was identified in 115 patients with EGC (34.6%) and 83 with CRC (27.6%), with approximately half of these patients harboring CH-PD (CRC group, 44 of 83 [53.0%]; EGC group, 55 of 115 [47.8%]). Patients with EGC and CH-PD exhibited a significantly worse median OS of 16.0 (95% CI, 11.6-22.3) months compared with 21.6 (95% CI, 19.6-24.3) months for those without CH-PD (P = .01). For patients with CRC and EGC, CH and CH-PD were not associated with PFS differences in patients undergoing ICB or first-line chemotherapy. Neither CH nor CH-PD were correlated with baseline leukocyte levels or increased need for G-CSF support. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest CH and CH-PD are not directly associated with the treatment course of patients with metastatic gastrointestinal tract cancer receiving cancer-directed therapy.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsLeukemiaClinical RelevanceClonal HematopoiesisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID36729457
PMCPMC9896303
OpenAlexW4318917469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.